

Subconscious Energy
Mechanics
A website dedicated to Jesus Christ and
teaching metaphysical science

Chapter 13: Charging Techniques: Part III
Now that we’ve discussed in detail how to charge your subconscious for the purpose of feeling emotions more strongly, we’re now ready to talk about how to charge your other transcendental mental abilities. You may be wondering why your other transcendental abilities need to be discussed separately from charging emotions. Should not they all charge the same way? Well the answer is yes, technically they all do charge the exact same way. However, what separates emotions from your other transcendental abilities is going to be in the purpose of your charge. Charging emotion is generally done for the sole purpose of making yourself feel really good by experiencing the euphoria of some positive emotion at really high levels of intensity. Your other transcendental abilities however are generally going to be charged for the purpose of enhancing your performance – at least that’s the context under which we will be discussing them. This difference in purpose plays a huge role in the way we go about charging these abilities. Charging for the purpose of performance involves a completely different approach to subconscious memory that is much more comprehensive in nature.
In fact this more encompassing discussion will probably make this the most theoretically intense chapter of the book. However, I believe the framework of charging that we discuss in this chapter will allow you to understand and control the subconscious at an even higher level of precision. This finer degree of control appears to be necessary to charge the subconscious for the purpose of performance. Once you do learn this level of control, you’ll pretty much be able to charge your subconscious to get into the zone for just about any skill or activity you'd like to. It should be noted that this more complex view of subconscious memory is something I only came to believe in because the techniques for charging emotion, discussed in the last two chapters, didn’t quite work for charging other transcendental abilities. Thus my effort to understand how to more proficiently charge the subconscious for the purpose of performance lead me to this more complex formalism. I say this simply to acknowledge that I certainly did not prefer nor go out of my way to think in terms of this more comprehensive formalism. However, the goal of learning how to charge the subconscious for performance has lead me toward this alternative way of thinking about subconscious memory and how the subconscious charges.
THE DROP OFF PROBLEM
In my years of experience controlling subconscious energy, I have to say that the trickiest type of charge to pull off with my subconscious used to always be transcendental creativity. Although I could do it, I was never quite able to do it very efficiently. I had to do a lot of prolonged and all over the place charging to finally get what felt like only a little bit of a transcendental creativity charge. It was fairly clear to me that I didn’t fully understand how to charge my subconscious for this purpose and that something was clearly missing from my understanding of how the subconscious worked. I later realized that it wasn’t necessarily transcendental creativity that was hard to charge, it was charging my subconscious for the purpose of transcendental performance. Around this time I was used to just charging my subconscious to feel some emotion with greater and greater intensity, so I figured I would try somehow to use that same principle and technique to help with my creativity charge. I wasn’t quite sure how to do that at first but decided that I would try to feel some emotion very strongly while performing a particular activity. For example back then I wanted to be a better conversationalist and particularly wanted to get “in the zone” with being able to come up with good jokes on the fly during conversation. To accomplish this, I decided that I would charge the humor emotion at a very intense level.
At that time I figured that if I imagined some story in my mind and expressed it in a way that involved telling jokes and charging the humor emotion while doing so, then this would allow me to access that same charge while in an actual conversation in the real world. I didn’t exactly know if that would work but I figured that if I just kept charging this way, then I’d be able to eventually get in the zone and perform transcendentally as needed. However, after a few test cases, I realized that this didn’t quite work out the way I had hoped it would. No matter how much I'd charge the humor emotion in this manner, it never quite put me in the zone the way I wanted it to although it did help with my performance at least little bit. After having some trouble with this particular form of subconscious control, I started to think that maybe I wasn’t charging my subconscious intensely enough. So I then tried to charge the humor emotion even more intensely than before. I would just keep charging this emotion more and more, playing out some story in my mind, with the hope that this higher level of intensity would somehow carry over to real world conversations and enable me to tell jokes at a transcendental level. However, I then noticed a major problem that occurred with this approach that gave me a hint as to what I might be doing wrong. I noticed that it was very easy for me to focus on the story in my mind and feel a huge amount of the humor emotion while doing so. However, whenever I got into a real world conversation, I would feel the intensity of this emotion suddenly drop off rather quickly.
At first I didn’t think too much of this and simply assumed that it must not be necessary for transcendental performance charging. After all I had managed to enter the zone and perform at a transcendental level many times in the past and didn’t remember actually feeling extremely intense levels of emotion during those times either, although I did feel some emotion to a relatively mild degree. However, after spending many years studying the subconscious since that early point, I then realized that this drop off problem was a much bigger deal than I had initially understood it be. Recall from chapter 3 that you’re usually going to feel some emotion fairly strongly while you’re using a transcendental mental ability. Well this same principle applies when you’re trying to tell jokes in a conversation at a transcendental level. I then figured that the key to charging for transcendental performance in this circumstance required me to charge my subconscious to very high levels of emotional intensity and then maintain that intensity while engaged in the act of conversation. This was something I’d never actually done before and wasn’t entirely sure was even possible. Normally, to reach these higher levels of charge, I’d just focus on some main subject, or category, and then tell a story in my mind that revolved around it. If I wanted to feel that emotion very intensely later, I’d just focus again on that same main subject or category. This new goal however required me to be much more dynamic with my charge.
In a sense I needed to keep the subconscious memory, that carried the charge, in an active state while performing some real world activity – such as holding a conservation. This was not something I’d ever done before. Normally I’m able to feel the emotion of my charge throughout the day as a result the subconscious memory, which carries the charge, switching to a passive state and then affecting my mood. But the emotional intensity of my mood didn’t seem to be sufficient for helping me to perform at a transcendental level and I wasn’t quite sure how I was going to keep this subconscious memory in an active state while performing some real world activity. This ultimately represents the inherent problem with charging the subconscious for the purpose of transcendental performance. To charge the subconscious, you need to have some main subject or category carrying the charge. However, when you’re interacting with others and the environment around you in the real world, you will no doubt have to focus on many different subjects that all look very different to your subconscious from the main one that’s carrying the charge. This is why the feeling of emotion, no matter how intensely I charged it, always dropped off whenever I had to perform some activity in the world. I couldn't actually keep my focus on the main subject or category carrying the charge while performing the activity. As a result, it would always revert from an active state back to a passive state.
But then how do you maintain a high level of emotional intensity without some main subject to carry the charge? It’s quite easy to keep focusing on a single subject or category and add energy over and over again to its memory while in a transcendental state. However, that’s going to be very difficult to do with multiple subjects at a time – which you'd expect me to consistently end up focusing on at some point as I'm performing some activity. Even then how would I accomplish such a thing in a preplanned way that would allow me to go into any circumstance in the real world and start performing at a transcendental level? This dilemma shows the fundamental difference between charging the subconscious for the purpose of emotion and charging it for the purpose of performance. The memory logistics involved in transcendental performance are much more complicated and nuanced than it is for emotion. This was why transcendental performance charging gave me so much trouble to understand on a deeper theoretical level. Subconscious memory functions completely differently when charging emotion, and even the other types of charges we’ll discuss in the book II, compared to transcendental performance charging. To understand how to perform a charge for performance properly, we’re going to have to look at the nature of subconscious memory from a whole new perspective. In fact, as you will see, this new approach requires us to think about subconscious memory in a much more geometric way.
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT SUBJECT FORMS
In order to get a better understanding of how to charge the subconscious for transcendental performance, we must go back to basics and talk about the nature of subjects in your subconscious memory. However, what we’re now going to do is make an important distinction between two different kinds of subjects, at least from the perspective of the way they appear to the conscious mind. Now so far we’ve been focusing on subjects that have a very obvious and explicit form to them. For example let’s say that I want to charge the love emotion by focusing on my girlfriend. In this case, the subject is very clear, obvious and easy to define. This would be an example of what I like to call an explicit subject form. Not all subjects though take on this super clear and easy to focus on form. To understand this, let’s look at another hypothetical circumstance. Let’s imagine that a person is sitting at their desk at work and receives an email requesting to fax some document, which is included as an attachment in the email, to a client. They then download the document, print it, walk over to the fax machine, retrieve the printed document and then fax it to the client. A rather simple task to carry out for the most part.
As an exercise though, let’s now try to see if we can go through the rather exhaustive task of actually naming all of the subjects that the worker focused on at some point since receiving the email. The first subject would probably be the computer the worker was using and then maybe the email they received, the file they downloaded, the printer they used, the document they printed and the fax machine they used to send the document. Would you agree that these were all of the subjects that the worker had to focus on at some point as they carried out the task in the example? Or were there more subjects that I missed? Well if we really want to get pedantic about it we could say that the person had to also focus on the room itself, the lights in the room, the people in the office...even the floor at some point as they were carrying out this task. It’s fair to say that the worker’s attention traversed all of these different aspects of the environment at some point, even if to lesser degrees than some of the main subjects involved in completing the task. And if we wanted to get even more pedantic, we could probably even find other points of focus that the worker’s attention traversed at some point in the example. This rather exhaustive exercise shows us that it can be relatively difficult for us to be consciously aware of all the subjects that our attention has focused on at some point while engaged in a particular activity.
Yet, presumably, our subconscious would still store information about the experience of some activity, such as one similar to the worker’s, to memory. Furthermore this saved information is likely to still be organized in your subconscious memory by subject even though it’s hard to directly focus on some of the subjects involved. However, I get the sense that if I used my imagination and thought about any one of these hard to focus on subjects in my mind, such as the printer, I would probably remember the whole experience through association. Perhaps in this kind of circumstance, where one’s attention has traversed so many different subjects in a relatively short period of time, the subconscious memories of all of the subjects involved, including the hard to focus on ones, are all "smooshed" together so to speak and recalling one tends to recall the others as well. This would actually give us a new kind of subject closeness that is different from the categorical kind we looked at it chapter 10. However, either way, it would be very difficult to talk about all of the subjects involved in this kind of circumstance as they don’t all take on a more explicit form that is easy for us to single out and talk about. These kind of subjects have what I like to call an implicit subject form. We know that there are a whole bunch of subjects that are there, in our subconscious memory, storing this experience but it’s hard to work with them individually, like we could with explicit subject forms.
But if we’re going to charge our subconscious so that we’re able to perform some activity like this transcendentally, then we’re going to have to figure out how to charge our subconscious using these more implicit subject forms rather than just the explicit ones. Now while this may sound a bit daunting, there is actually a way of accomplishing this. In doing so, we're going to be making the subconscious memory of these more implicit subject forms more and more positive in nature. This effectively means charging them and enabling us to have an easier time entering a transcendental state while performing the activity – which in turn means performing the activity at a transcendental level. However, to pull this off, we’re going to have to create a new subconscious memory construct that is actually a bit different from a subject and category and will require us to think about subconscious memory from a more geometrical perspective. We will discuss this new kind of formalism in the next section.
SUBCONSCIOUS PATHS
To understand how to work with implicit subjects in your subconscious memory so that you're able to charge them up and perform at a transcendental level, we’ll first have to look at subconscious memory in a slightly different way. To set up this new perspective, I’d like to first focus on a fairly common phenomenon that might seem like an extraordinarily random topic to discuss at this current moment. However, I ask the reader to trust that I’m going somewhere with this. I’d like to take a few moments to look at the phenomenon of professional dance performances. Have you ever been to a live concert or saw the video of a live performance where some artist was singing on stage? If you’re like most people, then you probably have at some point in your life. You may recall performances where the singer had back up dancers on stage and performed a relatively complex dance routine with them in a highly synchronized way. What you might have found particularly impressive about these dance moves wasn’t just the synchronization displayed in the performance, or even the athleticism required to pull them off. Rather you may have also been impressed by the sheer number of dance moves performed during the song.
As each performer enacts the same dance moves in sync, it is clear that they are all working from the same dance routine and are simply using their memory to recall each step in the routine. By the end of the routine, they will have performed an extraordinary number of dance steps during the performance and were only able to do so through the sheer power of their memory. And that’s what I’d like to really take a deeper look into here. Specifically, what’s going on inside a person’s memory that allows them to perform a dance routine with such a large number of steps to it? To understand this, it is important to remember that the ability to recall past events, or remember things, is actually just another form of subconscious expression in the form of altering one’s perception. Your brain is always charging your subconscious, at the ground state level, in a way that allows you to remember things pretty easily most of the time. However, using the ground state charge to remember things will only allow you to remember so much. In other words, your normal performance level when it comes to remembering things isn’t all that impressive – at least for the average person. It is possible however to use intention to charge your subconscious to be able to remember things in way that goes far beyond your normal performance level.
I believe that the dancers who perform these complex routines have actually performed this kind of memory recall charge and that this is actually what allows them to remember all of these different steps during their routine. We’ll talk more directly have about how to perform a charge like this later in the chapter. However, for now, we can simply say that they charge their subconscious for this purpose by constantly practicing and rehearsing the routine day in and day out, over and over again. At first, they will probably have a hard time remembering each step in the routine and will need constant reminders of what step is next in the routine. However, as the dancer keeps practicing the full routine more and more, they start to have an easier time remembering the next step in the routine and start to perform the routine much more smoothly and naturally. Eventually it no longer even takes that much conscious effort from them to try to remember the steps in the routine. After a while they sort of instinctively just know what step is next in the routine once they’ve performed the step prior. By this time it will feel as though a compulsion is actually guiding them by causing them to feel an urge to perform step 3 after step 2 and step 4 after step 3 and so on. In a sense, it is as though their subconscious instinct is now helping them to perform the routine.
What’s interesting about this is that the subconscious will generally be able to compel the dancer through the whole routine once they’ve reached this point. Without even requiring much conscious effort, the dancer will feel a natural compulsion to perform each step in the routine from start to finish. And it doesn’t really matter if it’s ten steps or a hundred steps or a thousand, the subconscious can remember it all and compel the performer through the whole routine when charged properly. You may have noticed a similar kind of “guiding” feeling of compulsion whenever you listen to a song that you’re very familiar with. If you suddenly hear a song on the radio that you’ve heard many times before, you might feel an urge to sing along with the song and recite the lyrics in sync with the song's vocals as it plays on the radio. If you really like the song, this urge can sometimes be rather strong and will feel almost irresistible – you feel like you simply must sing along. Furthermore subconscious compulsion will essentially urge you to keep singing lyrics in the same sequence as you normally hear them until you get to the end of the song.
Ok but why do we care about any of this when it comes to transcendental performance charging? Well because this phenomenon of being compelled to perform a dance sequence actually gives us some meaningful insight into the nature of subconscious memory as it relates to the general concept of performance. Specifically it shows us that subjects have the ability to essentially link to each other in a very interesting way that goes beyond the categorical nature of subjects mentioned in chapter 10. For example, when you’re practicing a dance routine, you might think of dance step 1 as a particular subject. Now when you focus on the first step in the routine, you feel a natural compulsion to move your body into a certain stance that reflects the first step of the routine. But this is not the only information stored in this particular subconscious memory. Rather that memory, when accessed by your attention, will also compel you to focus on step 2 in the dance routine. When you focus on step 2, you feel compelled to now move your body into that step’s dance pose. At the same time, you also feel compelled to focus on step 3 in the dance routine and then, as you do so, move your body into that steps formation and then direct your focus to step 4 and so on. Thus we see a very peculiar abstract but also geometrical like construct forming in our subconscious memory based on the way these particular series of subjects related to each other.
In computer science, these kind of abstract yet geometrical like structures are called data structures. And the subconscious like data structure we observed in subconscious memory for the dance routine most closely resembles a data structure in computer science called a “linked list”. It is not necessary to completely understand what data structures are in programming or to think of your subconscious in terms of them. However, it is important to understand that subjects in your subconscious memory are able to be related to each other in a way that allows them to form a special kind of linear sequence or series. In this series of subjects, each subject has a number or place within the sequence. And when you focus on the first subject in that series – let’s call it subject 1, you not only recall the feelings and thoughts associated with subject 1’s subconscious memory, but you also feel a compulsion to focus on subject 2 in the series and then subject 3 and so on. This causes the subject series to compel you to experience certain thoughts and feelings in a very "linear" way. For example it wouldn't be the case that you focus on subject 4 in the series and then feel naturally compelled to focus on subject 1. If you did want to focus on subject 1 after having focused on subject 4 first, then you’d have to resist the urge from subject 4’s memory to focus on subject 5.
This means that it wouldn’t feel smooth or natural to focus on different parts of the subject series out of the sequence that’s been charged. You may notice this for example when you’re listening to a song. If you suddenly hear the song playing midway into the chorus, you’d feel a natural compulsion to sing along with the song from that particular point. It would be difficult for you to hear the song midway into the chorus and then start singing from the beginning of the chorus suddenly. Of course you could still do it since you have free will but you’d have to resist the urge to sing along with the song from the point that you’re actually hearing it at. A similar thing can be said about trying to perform different steps in the dance routine out of sequence. It’s also important to note that the subject series making up the dance routine consists of mostly explicit subject forms that were fairly easy to focus on and define on a conscious level – these were just the individual dance steps that make up the routine. However, a subject series can also be more implicit in nature as well. For example when you listen to a song over and over again, your subconscious will store information about the experience of listening to the song into implicit subject forms in your subconscious memory. Furthermore, those implicit subject forms will be stored in the form of a subject series, with each implicit subject form representing some timestamp or particular moment in the song. When your subconscious compels you to think and behave according this subject series, it will essentially compel you to sing the song in the sequence that you normally hear it. And, if you hear the song from the middle, then your subconscious will compel you through the subject series from the midway point as well.
This indicates that the same subject series we looked at in the dance routine case has also formed in our subconscious memory for the familiar song, but has done so in a more implicit form. Now where these subject series really become special is when they’re actually made up of categories. For example it is possible to have a series of categories that are all connected and compel you in a sequential way as well. In this case, you would feel a natural compulsion that guides your behavior through a certain type of circumstance that changes with time rather than a unique one which does not. In other words the circumstances are allowed to change in a way that was not applicable with the static, or unchanging, song or dance routine. A good example of this involves an experience in customer service I had a while back during my younger years. I used to work in customer service for a cable company and occasionally would have to deal with certain cable company issues such as overnight maintenance, which regularly caused service outages for customers, a rate increase where customers had to pay more for services or a PPV event. All of these occurrences would cause a rather large influx of customers to call in and discuss them.
During these times, I would usually get the same series of questions over and over again for the same problems but from different customers each time. For example if there was a service outage, the first question from a customer would usually be to inquire about why their service wasn’t working. I’d then tell them that there’s an outage in their area due to planned maintenance – which happened so often, it was easier to just admit that is was planned rather than to omit it. They’d then ask other questions such as why they weren’t informed about this scheduled maintenance, why it happens so often, what kind of compensation they will be receiving and so on. As these kinds of calls kept coming in, I ended up having to answer the same series of questions over and over again – often in the same order. Eventually I’d reach a point where, although I didn’t realize it at the time, I’d feel a kind of guiding compulsion or urge to answer these questions in a certain way, the same way I had pretty much been answering them each time they were asked prior. This urge however felt similar to the kind that a person might have when they perform a certain step in dance routine and then feel an urge to the perform the next step in the routine and the next step after that. You could also say that it was similar to the urge a person might feel when they hear song lyrics and then want to sing the next set of lyrics in the song and the next set after that.
The only difference was that this specific urge didn’t apply to a static non-changing event. Some of the questions from these customers were a little different than others and came in slightly different orders each time. Furthermore my responses were a little different each time as well. But overall the questions were mostly the same and the order in which they were asked was often very similar. In the end, a series of categories formed in my subconscious memory that were able to compel me through a type of event that changed with time but still had the semblance of a sequence to it as well. This category series is a very special and very important subconscious construct when it comes to the phenomenon of transcendental performance. This is because this type of series can help to compel us through a large variety of real world activities such as dancing, conversation, poetry, storytelling, making music, playing sports, doing math and so on. As long as these activities follow certain sequence like patterns, which they just about always do, then you’ll be able charge a category series that will help to compel you through these activities. For example if you’re in a boxing match, you may feel a natural compulsion to throw a counter right hook whenever you notice your opponent putting too much weight on their right back foot – assuming they’re not a southpaw. If you continually practice this in sparring with different opponents, you may end up charging a category series that compels you to perform this technique and for which gets recalled whenever you see any opponent of yours move in a certain way – the same way you saw and practiced against in sparring. Furthermore the first category in that series would probably be the sight of the opponent putting weight on their back foot. When your attention focuses on this category and its subconscious memory switches to an active state, then you will feel a series of compulsions that guide you into throwing a counter right.
Earlier I mentioned that, in order to talk about charging implicit subject forms, we’d need a new subconscious memory construct in order to pull this off. Well that new construct of course is the subject series that we’ve been discussing. However, I’ve only been calling it a subject or category series here as I thought that this terminology might help you to get a more intuitive sense of what it is as well as provide you with a more geometrical interpretation of how it works. Going forward though, we will refer to these subconscious memory series by a new terminology that I’ve come to favor and that is a subconscious path. Of course I call it this because it seems to me like a kind of path forms in your subconscious memory and that your attention is able to travel through it in a sense. When your attention focuses one subject or category in the path, you're compelled to focus on next subject or category in the path and the next one after that and keep doing this until you reach the end of it – such as the end of a song or dance routine for example. Thus, in a certain sense, your attention is "traveling" or "traversing" the subconscious path. And as your attention travels through it in this manner, you will be compelled to perform a sequence of behaviors as a result. For sake of complete clarity though, we can more officially say that a subconscious path is a set of subjects or categories in your subconscious memory that are all related to each other in the sense that they make up an ordered sequence of compulsions. A rather cold and sterile definition, but an apt one nonetheless. The subconscious memory you have for a song you’ve heard 100x, for example, is actually a subconscious path. In customer service, by answering the same sequence of questions over and over again, I developed subconscious paths for these questions – perhaps having a single path for each one of these common questions. We will talk about the nature of multiple subconscious paths in more detail later in the chapter. For now, you can simply assume that most transcendental performances will require multiple paths rather than a single one. For example, when you fight the same opponent over and over again in boxing, you will probably develop subconscious paths who first subject or category corresponds to certain behaviors you’ve noticed in your opponent. The remaining subjects or categories that make up these paths would then guide you into performing certain counter techniques in response.
On a side note, this is actually why feints in boxing are so important. They actually help to use a person’s established subconscious paths against them. Once a person feels a compulsion to begin a subconscious path, which is like hearing the first few lyrics of a song a you know, it will be hard for them to resist the urge to follow the rest of that path – just as it is hard to resist the urge not to sing the rest of the song’s lyrics. In boxing, a fighter may have a whole bunch of established subconscious paths that cause them to always perform the same moves in the same behavioral sequence over and over again. You can think of these as “tells” in a sense. If a fighter can figure out what these tells are and use them against their opponent, then it’s usually going to be a very bad night for the opponent. I believe this is what happened during the fight with Crawford vs Spence in 2023. It’s very difficult for a fighter to resist the urge of these established paths during the entire time that their fighting. Thus once a fighter is figured out, they will usually end up losing the match. Ok, I know I digressed here a bit but going back to our original discussion, you can see that subconscious paths are invaluable when it comes to working with the implicit subconscious forms that underlie real world activities. In order to understand how to charge our subconscious for the purpose of transcendental performance, we’ll need to learn how to directly build subconscious paths and charge them up.
1
PROPERTIES OF SUBCONSCIOUS PATHS
Before moving on to discussing how to actually charge subconscious paths, I’d like to first cover two important properties of paths that I believe are useful to be aware of. Now given that subconscious paths are just an ordered series of subjects or categories, the properties of paths are actually not all that different from subjects and categories themselves, as you may have suspected. However, the first property of subconscious paths I’d like to discuss is actually one that doesn’t really apply to a single subject or category by itself. This is the property of distance or length. In spite of how abstract many of these concepts of the subconscious are, subconscious paths actually do have a sense of distance to them. This represents how long the subconscious path is. For example, your subconscious can be charged to compel you through a dance sequence that has 5 steps or one that has 1000 steps. Clearly the 1000 step path has a much larger "distance" to it than the 5 step path. Similarly your subconscious can be charged to compel you to sing along to a 2 minute song or a 10 minute one. Clearly the subconscious path for the 2 min song is much shorter than the subconscious path for the 10 minute song.
An important property about shorter subconscious paths is that they tend to charge faster than longer subconscious paths. In fact the shorter the path is, the faster you will be able to charge it. And conversely, the longer the path is the longer it will take to charge it. This makes sense since subconscious charging occurs by repeating the same subconscious action, while in a transcendental state and focused on some main subject or category, over and over again. In the case of a subconscious path, you’d want to do this while your mind is, in a sense, traveling that subconscious path over and over again in order to charge it. For example when you charge your subconscious to remember a sequence of dance steps, you would generally do this by performing that sequence over and over again until you’re able to remember the full sequence without even giving much effort from your conscious mind to do so. Reaching this point would indicate that you’ve charged a subconscious path whose compulsions guide you through the dance routine. Now the more dance steps there are in a routine, the longer it will take for you to reach this point of automatic remembering with little conscious effort. For example a dance routine with a 1000 steps would take a lot longer to perform, and therefore a lot longer to repeat over and over again, than a dance routine with only 5 steps.
Clearly you’d be able to charge the subconscious path for the 5 step routine much faster than you could the path with the 1000 step routine. A similar thing could be said about how long it will take for you to easily memorize a 2 minute song vs a 10 minute song. Thus the shorter the distance of the subconscious path, the faster the subconscious path will charge. In my experience, I haven’t found much use for long subconscious paths and generally charge my subconscious for transcendental performance using many relatively short paths. This will make more sense as we continue our discussion on paths throughout the chapter. One last thing I wanted to mention about paths as it relates to distance is that they can even be thought of as having a kind of shape to them too. Specifically they can have a circular shape in some instances. When a song is stuck in your head, it’s actually because the last subject in the path redirects your attention back to the first subject making up the path, or at least an earlier subject in the sequence making up the path. Thus you will feel a continuous urge to sing in a way that loops itself around over and over again endlessly – which is why the song is stuck in your head. This path is only broken when you either resist the urge to think according to that path’s compulsion or by subconscious entropy – which, of course, does still occur with subconscious paths too.
The second property of subconscious paths I’d like to discuss has to do with their energy component and involves what happens when these paths become charged up. Again since paths are just a series of subjects or categories, the properties of charging them are going to be very similar to the properties of charging a single subject or category. For example as discussed many times previously, it was mentioned that all of your transcendental mental abilities are used to some degree whenever your subconscious charges at all. This in turn means that you will usually feel some emotion somewhat strongly whenever you’re using your transcendental abilities. Well this principle also applies to subconscious paths. When you’re using a path to perform at a transcendental level, you will usually feel some emotion rather strongly as you do. Furthermore the more charged up the path, the more intensely you’ll be able to express your transcendental mental abilities as your mind traverses this path. One interesting difference though between a single subject or category and a path has do with frequency. The energy component of some positive memory will generally only have one main subconscious frequency charged up in it. Although it can contain more than one, you would normally just focus on charging one at a time if you're charging for the purpose of emotion. This is because charging more than one frequency at the same time would likely just dilute how strongly you experience any one, thus defeating the purpose of the charge.
This is not necessarily the case with subconscious paths however since your attention does a lot of moving around between different subjects and contexts as it travels through the paths. This traveling tends to create a relatively emergent phenomenon in subconscious memory structure which allows you to experience different frequencies at different points in the path. This is useful for transcendental performance since I may want to quantize my subconscious at different frequencies during some activity. For example if I want to become a conversationalist and perform in engaging conversation at a transcendental level, I may want to be more funny at some points in the conversation, more confident at other points and then simply more excited at others. This last quality is because excitement, like laughter, can be very contagious due to the reflection principle. So if I can demonstrate excitement through my delivery – which relies on transcendental control – then I can cause the listener to also become excited. This in turn means they will be emotionally stimulated, which in turn also means they will be entertained. So it is helpful that subconscious paths allow us to experience different frequencies at different times as we traverse the path. It is even possible to charge a path in a way that allows you to feel a huge amount of emotion at one particular point in the path and then a huge amount of another emotion at a different part of the path. This would be like listening to a song and then feeling a huge amount of the fun emotion early on in the song and then a huge amount of the strength emotion later on in the song. I have never felt the need to charge a path in this particular manner however although I am aware that it can be done.
Before moving on, one last thing I’d like to look at with paths is what happens when you charge them specifically for the purpose of emotion. So far we’ve been focusing on paths as a means of charging the subconscious to perform at a transcendental level. But what if we wanted to use them to charge emotion instead? Well to understand this let’s first remember that, when we’re charging emotions, we’re usually doing so solely for the purpose of pleasure. This means that we just want to feel some positive emotion as intensely as possible. Well since shorter paths charge the fastest, we’re going to want to use a very short path to charge emotion. Furthermore since we’re going to want to keep our subconscious at relatively the same frequency, we’re going to want to focus on relatively the same scene, or context, in our mind as our attention traverses the path over and over again. This means that we’ll have to keep repeating the same story like scene in our mind over and over again and preferably do so in a way that doesn’t take too long – as we would expect from a relatively short subconscious path. Although we haven’t talked about how to charge subconscious paths yet, you can still see that these instructions mostly resemble the same instructions we already looked at in chapter 11 for charging emotion. Thus if our goal is simply charging for intensity, we don’t really need to use path formalism to talk about charging techniques. Keep in mind our other transcendental mental abilities wouldn't be very useful when charged using a single path that is very short. Thus it really only becomes necessary to discuss things in terms of subconscious paths when we’re talking about transcendental performance, which isn’t exactly based on intensity. Not understanding this and attempting to rely on intensity to perform at a transcendental level caused me a lot of problems for years.
CHARGING SUBCONSCIOUS PATHS
Let’s now talk about how to actually charge your subconscious paths. Fundamentally the technique is really not all that different than it was for charging emotion. However, the way we approach those fundamentals will be slightly different. The technique mostly starts off the same way, which is to hold an intention until you enter a transcendental state. Now in the case of emotion, you simply held the intention to feel some emotion more strongly since your goal was to feel more emotion. Well the same principle also applies to your other transcendental mental abilities as well. If you want to control your body a certain way, such as in singing or dancing, you’d hold the intention move a certain way until you enter a transcendental state. Similarly if you wanted to charge a belief, you’d hold the intention to believe something until you enter a transcendental state and if you wanted to charge your creativity, you’d hold the intention to create something until you enter a transcendental state. Now it is still true that, regardless of which intention you choose to hold, all of your transcendental mental abilities will still be quantized by that intention and will still charge up as a result. However, the specific intention you hold can help to slightly concentrate your charge on one specific transcendental mental ability more so than the others.
I should also note that the specific intention you’d use for charging transcendental creativity is a bit trickier than I’ve described here but we’ll discuss that special case in more detail later in the chapter. Now the second part of the charging process is where things start to look a bit different from the emotional case. To charge emotion, you were instructed to hold an intention while telling a story of some kind in your mind. However for transcendental performance, you will want to hold an intention while performing a specific activity of some kind. In fact charging emotion was really just a special case where the activity was storytelling. However, when charging for performance, we will want to make things much more general and be able to charge while performing any kind of activity whether it be one that is real or imagined. For the moment, we’ll simply talk about activities that occur in the real world. For example if you wish to play basketball at a transcendental level, you may attempt to do so by trying to play while also feeling an intense amount of motivation and ambition to win. You could accomplish this by simply holding the intention to win while playing basketball but you could also accomplish this by holding the intention to destroy your opponent while playing as well.
In this case you’d feel the emotion of “wanting to destroy” very strongly while you’re playing. When it comes to transcendental performance, you’re allowed to be a bit more free with your subconscious frequency so different intentions can be used to reach relatively similar outcomes in performance although the frequency would change somewhat. Part of learning how to perform at a transcendental level involves being aware of how certain intentions will quantize your performance compared to others. In some cases, the transcendental performance I get from an intention that says "I will win" may be better or more suited for the circumstance than the performance I get from an intention that says "I will destroy". Part of learning how to become better at performing transcendentally involves learning what intention best suits the circumstance you're performing transcendentally in and what experience you're hoping to get out of it. Before moving on, I’d like to mention that the particular activity that you’re engaged in will also play a role in properly quantizing your subconscious. When it came to emotion, you used stories to control your subconscious because they have a natural structure to them that helps your conscious mind command your subconscious mind using intention.
In the case of transcendental performance, this principle is mostly still in play but you will now be able to use the story like nature of the real world activity you're engaged in to produce intentions that properly command your subconscious. You will not necessarily need to make up a story in your mind like you did with emotion although you can still do this too. As an example, let's say that you’re playing a basketball game against a rival opponent. You think a lot about the history you have with your rival and feel even more determined to win the game so as not to lose bragging rights. The history you think of would actually be expressed by the abstract command component of your intention. Once your subconscious alters your perception to perceive this history, then the context of the game itself changes to you. It will become much more important and meaningful as a result, perhaps even containing a great deal of risk even though there is little chance of physical danger to you. In other words, the conscious mind will think of the basketball game in a manner that's not all that different from when it's telling a story. This way of looking at the activity you're performing in actually helps you to better control your subconscious mind as you're engaged in that activity.
That being said, because the activity itself will play a large role in quantizing your subconscious, different activities will favor different subconscious frequencies. For example it might be easy to charge my subconscious at the frequency of ambition and determination while playing a basketball game but hard to charge it while making relaxing music. Similarly it would be easy to charge the subconscious at the humor frequency when telling jokes in a conversation but hard to charge it while solving a math problem. Thus different activities will favor different subconscious frequencies and therefore will also favor certain kinds of transcendental performance charges and not others. It should be noted that some activities can favor antithetical subconscious frequencies as well. For example I remember when I used to have to speak in office meetings at work, I noticed that I had a much easier time doing so whenever I focused on having fun and thinking of it as an enjoyable social event. And when I didn’t do this, I would think of it as a form of public speaking and would often feel some anxiety as a result. This shows that the act of meeting with a group of people at work actually favors both the more positive fun and socializing frequencies and yet, at the same time, also favors more negative frequencies associated with fear of public speaking. Which type of frequency charges will depend on how my intentions contextualize the event.
Moving on to what actually happens when you’re in a transcendental state, well again the process is basically the same as it was for emotion. In this case, you’ll want to try to continue to perform the activity you’re engaged in using your subconscious instinct during the short window of time that you’re in a transcendental state and do so using an excitement burst as opposed to a calm burst. This essentially means giving a properly timed burst of effort, at the level of instinct, to continue performing the activity in a transcendental state. The excitement burst doesn't necessarily need to be as intense as you can possibly make it in the moment but, if it's too calm, then this may not work for most real world activities as your subconscious instinct may not be active enough to keep up with the real world environment. Thus how intense your burst is will depend on the activity and takes some experience to control properly and perform in a non-straining way. On top of this though, charging in this manner in general is trickier to do while performing a real world activity than it was for telling a story in your mind. We’ll talk more about why that is in the next section. However, when you enter a transcendental state while performing an activity, your subconscious instinct will temporarily involve itself in the activity and attempt to compel you in some manner that’s meant to help you to achieve the goal that you expressed through your intention. This compulsion will act as a kind of guide in how you’re to behave to reach your goal. However, because this compulsion can’t actually override free will, your negative mind must still choose to, in a sense, “go along” with this compulsion. This is generally easy to do when singing along to a song for example but you’re going to have to get used to doing this for interactive real world activities as well.
For example when in a conversation, your charged subconscious mind may compel you to bring up a certain topic of conversation or inflect your voice in a certain way in order to perform a particular vocal impression. Now in order to actually perform transcendentally, it is not enough to simply feel this compulsion from your subconscious. You must also, in a sense, acquiesce to it with your conscious mind. This means relaxing your conscious mind and letting go somewhat, similarly to what you do when you daydream or enter a transcendental state for storytelling when charging emotion. When you do this, you will successfully be able to enter a transcendental state and perform that activity using your subconscious instinct – which allows you to perform transcendentally. We will talk a bit more about this process shortly. However, while you will want to acquiesce to compulsions from your subconscious to some degree, you obviously can’t acquiesce and go along with all of them otherwise they could cause you to engage in behaviors that get you in to a lot of trouble. This of course is due to the fact that your subconscious mind does not have as much logic and rationality – and particularly inhibition – as your conscious mind does. So there’s a balancing act between how much acquiescing you do to your instinct and how much resisting you do to it. For example if you enter a transcendental state while holding a conversation and then feel a compulsion to say something mean to the listener while in a transcendental state, you would make sure not to acquiesce to this kind of compulsion.
Now, as with an emotional charge, these compulsions will start out fairly weak and will be easy to resist. In fact they may even be difficult to notice at all. However, as you keep going in and out of a transcendental state while performing an activity, your subconscious will become more and more volatile relative to this particular activity. This means that you will have an easier and easier time entering a transcendental state while performing that activity and, as you continue to do so, your subconscious will be able to express itself more and more intensely while you perform that activity. This is ultimately the same as saying that your subconscious is charging to help you perform more and more transcendentally while performing that activity. Doing this will also cause a subconscious path to form in your subconscious memory and become more and more charged as well. There is much more to discuss about subconscious paths and what happens when they charge but this is the basic technique for how to charge them.
Before moving on, it should also be noted that if your attention traverses a subconscious path and you don't continuously enter a transcendental state and switch to performing that activity using your instinct, then subconscious entropy happens and the path then just becomes more and more negative as a result. As the path becomes more and more negative, you will be more and more relegated to a normal performance level as a result. When this occurs, you will just feel the normal ground state compulsions you always feel and so, in essence, it will mostly feel like the compulsion from the path has disappeared. You notice this when you listen to a song that was very emotionally stimulating to you but is getting older and older. As first you felt a great deal of compulsion as you listened to the song. But after a while, it didn't feel like you felt any at all. This is because the path is actually full of negative memory now and just blends in with the rest of your ground state compulsions.
SUBCONSCIOUS ENERGY CATCHING
One thing I’d like to mention about entering a transcendental state while performing a real world activity is that it tends to be more difficult to pull off than entering a transcendental state while focused on an activity in your own imagination. The reason why has to do with the way our attention gets divided up when performing real world activities. I mentioned last chapter that your brain charges your subconscious in a way that compels you to divide your attention up between different aspects of some activity. This allows you to multi-task and ultimately end up performing that activity rationally and smoothly at a normal performance level. While this is ideal for our everyday behaviors, it does tend to get in the way of charging for transcendental performance. Normal activities eat up so much of our total attention that it can be difficult to still leave enough of it left over for the act of trying to charge. For example when I’m in a conversation and hold the intention to say something funny while I’m speaking, I can’t stop the conversation, watch and wait until I notice my awareness entering a transcendental state and then resume the conversation once I have entered this state. I’ve got to still try to hold a conversation normally – using my negative mind and performance level – until I enter a transcendental state. And even then, when I do enter a transcendental state, I have to try to remember to start trying to converse while also using my subconscious instinct, or my positive mind, too.
If I don’t remember to do this, then my subconscious won’t charge properly for this activity. It’s very important to remember to “switch” to using your positive mind to continue performing the activity once you’re in a transcendental state. The problem is that performing all of these mental activities to charge your subconscious takes up a lot of our attention to pull off. Now when you’re by yourself and can easily tune out the rest of the world – as you normally would be when charging emotion – then it’s easy to dedicate enough of your attention toward the act of charging your subconscious. However, this is a lot harder to do for real world activities. This is made worse by the fact that, earlier on in a charge, a transcendental state of awareness doesn’t come on as strongly and is harder to notice. The only real way that I’m able to still charge while performing some activity is to simply give less of my attention toward the real world activity. For example if I’m in a conversation, I simply have to give less of my attention toward the conversation so that some of it is freed up to monitor my charging efforts. This tends to give me a very “air headed” kind of feeling when I’m in a conversation because I have to tune it out somewhat in order to charge and yet, at the same time, still continue to hold the conversation and engage with the person I’m speaking to.
This balance between attention that goes into continually performing the activity and into the act of charging can be tricky and is something that you’ll have to get used to for transcendental performance charging. In many cases, because it’s too hard to give enough attention to monitoring how long I’ve been holding an intention and whether or not I’m about to enter a transcendental state, I will simply not do so. This tends to cause the feeling of my awareness entering a transcendental state to catch me by surprise. When this occurs, I have to make sure to still acquiesce to this feeling and allow my mind to drift into a transcendental state even if it does feel sudden and unexpected in this circumstance. Sometimes I may be too caught up in the activity and may not allow my mind to fully enter a transcendental state when I’m able to do so. If I don’t then it will simply be the case that I missed my opportunity and will have to wait for the next time around when I feel my awareness entering a transcendental state again. For this reason, I often like to refer to the process described here as energy catching. This is because when I’m holding an intention until I enter a transcendental state while performing an activity, it will often feel as though I have to catch the moment when my awareness is drifting into a transcendental state and then remember to both allow my mind to drift into that state and to switch to performing that activity using my subconscious instinct while in a transcendental state.
Now it may seem like it should be rather easy to notice your own awareness drifting but it’s actually rather difficult to do when so much of your attention is going into something else. Sure you’ll always feel it trying to enter a transcendental state no matter what, but it still eats up attention to actually watch it or properly adjust your behavior in response to it. And sometimes you may be too focused on something else to respond in time to take advantage of this state. So in many instances, it will feel like you have to catch a “wave” of energy or awareness as it were. However, if you do successfully manage to keep catching this wave, which means that you’re successfully entering a transcendental state over and over again and using subconscious instinct to continue to perform that activity when you do, then your subconscious will charge a path for that activity more and more. As this path continues to charge, it will actually get easier and easier to notice your awareness drifting into a transcendental state and to continue using subconscious instinct to perform that activity while your awareness is in this state. As this subconscious path continues to charge, eventually my subconscious will become so volatile toward this activity that it will feel relatively effortless to catch myself entering a transcendental state and to perform that activity using my instinct while I’m in it. Eventually it will feel as though I’m able to continuously perform that activity using my instinct with little effort from my conscious mind. This special state of awareness is known as being “in the zone”. We will talk more about this special state again later in the chapter.
PATH CLOSENESS
I'd like to now talk about the concept of "closeness" as it relates to subconscious paths. Recall from chapter 10 that subjects can actually be "close" to each other in subconscious memory by virtue of how similar they appear to your subconscious mind. If there is a main subject in your subconscious memory that carries a charge, then the compulsion stored in that subconscious memory will be recalled whenever you focus on different subject that, to your subconscious mind, looks similar to the main subject. The degree to which this compulsion is felt will be determined by how much the similar subject resembles the main subject to your subconscious. This principle works in pretty much the same way for subconscious paths but now we're going to look at it in a much more complete and generalized way. To understand this more complete view, we must now address a second component of subconscious memory that experiences a quality of "closeness" and is the activity associated with the subconscious memory. Specifically this refers to the actual activity you were performing while the experiences in the subconscious memory were being stored.
For example if you were playing basketball while focused on some particular subject, then the activity of playing basketball will be stored in the subconscious of memory of that subject. Now the actual activity you were engaged in while some experience is being stored to subconscious memory is not very consequential when it comes to charging emotion but, as you might expect, it is very important when it comes to charging the subconscious for performance. The reason once again has to with recall scalability. This just refers to degree to which you feel a compulsion or association stored in subconscious memory based on the similarity of some minor subject to a main subject that carries the charge. It was already mentioned the more similar some minor subject is to a main subject, the more fully you will feel the compulsion stored in main subject when focused on the minor subject. But the similarity of the subjects themselves is not the only parameter that determines how fully you feel the compulsion stored in the main subject. The similarity in the activity stored in subconscious memory also determines this as well.
As an example, let's say that I charge a subconscious path that helps me to tell jokes – we will talk more about how to charge this kind of path later in the chapter. I charge this path while focused on person A and in a conversation with them. Well, let's then say that at some later time I decide to hold a conversation with person B while the subconscious path charged for person A still has a charge. Can I use the path charged for person A to help me tell jokes with person B? Well yes but the degree to which the path for A gets called will depend in part on how much person B reminds me of person A or, put another way, how similar they appear to my subconscious mind. Just picking random numbers here, if person B looks 50% similar to person A, then I'll only feel compelled by the path associated with person A at 50% of it's full strength or at 50% of the strength I'd experienced it if I were focused on person A instead. Thus the more similar person B is to person A from the perspective of my subconscious mind, then the more fully the path associated with person A can be used for person B.
Put more generally, we can say that the more similar some minor subject is to a main subject that makes up a subconscious path, the more fully the subconscious path for the major subject can be used when focusing on the minor subject. This is also true if the subconscious path actually consists of categories and the thing being compared is a minor category to main category. For example if I keep going in and out of a transcendental state while telling jokes in a conversation with a certain type of person, let's say work coworkers, then eventually a subconscious path will form in my subconscious memory that helps me to tell jokes while focused on coworkers. Now if I focus on someone later who is not a coworker and hold a conversation with them, the degree to which I can still use the path associated with the category "coworker" will depend on how much this person reminds my subconscious of someone who is in the coworker category.
Now, although we've been focused on this concept of recall scalability for similarities in subjects or categories, it is also true that the similarity of the activity itself plays a role in determining how strongly a subconscious path for a main subject gets recalled when focusing on a minor subject. As an example, let's say that I'm focused on person A in the above example but instead of holding a conversation with them in person, I'm now talking to them on the phone. I would notice that I'm still able to tell jokes with this person at a transcendental level but not easily as I could while speaking to them in person. This is because the activity of speaking over the phone looks a bit different to my subconscious from the act of speaking to them in person. Thus the corresponding subconscious path is not as fully called or felt as strongly. Now if I actually chat with this individual over the computer instead, then I would I notice that it's much harder to tell jokes at a transcendental level. This is because the activity of holding a conversation through electronic chat looks extremely different to my subconscious than the act of speaking to them in person. I might notice that very little of the charge that's helps me tell jokes in person actually carries over to telling jokes through chat. This same principle of closeness in activity also applies of course to categories as well.
Thus we can say that subconscious paths also experience a quality of closeness just like the subjects or categories that make them up. However, in the case of subconscious paths, similarity in activity is also parameter that determines closeness, not just similarity in the subject or category. Putting this another way, we can say that path closeness is determined by how similar the main subject or category is to some minor subject or category and how close the activity you're performing while focused on the main subject or category is to the activity you're performing while focused on the minor subject or category. If you focus on a minor subject that doesn't look to similar to the main subject but the activity looks very similar to your subconscious, then some of that transcendental performance charge will still carry over. However if you focus on a minor subject that looks nothing like the main subject to your subconscious and the activity also looks very different, then likely very little of the charge will carry over and you will have to charge a new subconscious path for this new circumstance.
Before moving on, it should be noted that there are other parameters that could be considered extensions of the main subject or category that can also affect path closeness such as the environment, time of day, temperature and so on. However, for our purposes, it is enough to simply discuss path closeness in terms of the subject or category and activity being performed. It should also be noted that technically activity closeness plays a role in the techniques we discussed for charging emotion as well. However because the activity was always the same – telling a story in your mind – it was not necessary to discuss it then.
MULTIPLE SUBCONSCIOUS PATHS
So far we’ve mostly been discussing how subconscious paths work by looking at a single path at a time. However, in reality, this is highly unrealistic as a single path would generally not be very useful to us for transcendental performance. The reason why this is the case has to do with the concept of path closeness. In the previous section, it was mentioned that a subconscious path can be close to other paths not only based on similarities in the subjects or categories that make them up, but also based on similarities in the activity you were performing while focused on those subjects or categories. This apparent closeness in activity creates a whole new kind of issue that didn't really apply when charging emotion. This new problem is the fact that activities themselves tend to be much harder for the subconscious to recognize than subjects or categories. Since there tends to be a lot going in an activity that causes it to be much more dynamic in nature, the subconscious tends to have trouble recognizing it well enough to always recall the same subconscious path you charged while performing that activity previously. This includes the main subconscious path that carried the charged too.
To understand this, I often like to compare it to the way biometric data is often stored in a computer at a work facility. When starting a new job in the past, you probably received an access card to enter the building and were required to store biometric data from your fingerprint into a computer to punch in or access high security areas of the building. When storing biometric data, you probably placed your finger on top of a glass like surface while the device scanned your fingerprint and registered it into the computer. After doing this once, the computer operating the scanning device probably prompted you to remove your finger and then place it back on the scanning device in order to register your print again. You were probably prompted by the device to do this multiple times before your prints were fully registered in to the work database. But then why ask you to remove your finger and place it back on the device to be scanned again when it obviously didn't change within those few seconds of being prompted? Well the reason the device has been programmed to take multiple scans of your fingerprint is because your print might look different to the computer depending on the angle you place it on the scanner.
It is possible that you could place your finger on the scanning device in the future and the device not recognize you because your print looks too different from the one stored in the database to be considered a match. To avoid this, your prints are scanned from multiple angles to ensure that the computer always recognizes your prints, no matter what angle you place it on the scanner. The more scans from different angles or perspectives the computer retrieves the less a chance there is that the computer won't recognize your print in the future. Although this may sound a bit strange, I believe this is almost exactly how the subconscious mind works too. When you perform some activity and charge a subconscious path for it, it is actually not that easy for your subconscious mind to recognize that same activity again, at a later time, well enough to fully recall the main subconscious path you charged up for it previously. To the conscious mind, the activity would always look exactly the same with no issues. But to the subconscious mind, the activity can actually look different when engaging in it from different perspectives. For example if you're playing basketball against person A one day and then play basketball again against person B another day, then the conscious mind can easily recognize that you're playing basketball in both cases.
However to the subconscious mind, it won't always be obvious that you're playing basketball even when you actually are. This is important because it means that subconscious paths you charged while playing basketball, which are required to be accessed to help you perform transcendentally, won't always be accessible the entire time that you're actually playing basketball. This is a problem because, in theory, if you're not playing basketball while being compelled by a charged subconscious path, then your performance level will just become normal again. During some of the moments that you're playing, the subconscious mind will successfully recognize that you're playing basketball and will call a subconscious path to help you perform transcendentally. But during other times, when playing basketball from a different perspective or circumstance, the activity will become somewhat unfamiliar to your subconscious and a subconscious path will not be accessible to help your performance. For example when attempting to shoot the ball from the foul line against person B, the subconscious may successfully recognize this activity from the times you did it against person A and will access a subconscious path to help you shoot the ball transcendentally. However if you're on defense and are attempting to steal the ball against person B, then the subconscious may not recognize that you're playing basketball from this perspective and will not access a subconscious path to help you steal the ball at a transcendental level.
But then how do you ensure that the activity always looks familiar enough to your subconscious to ensure that at a subconscious path is always being called and accessed the entire time that you're playing basketball? In theory, this would ensure that you're performing at a transcendental level at all times as you're playing basketball. Well the key to achieving this is very similar to what the fingerprint scanner did to ensure that it would always recognize your fingerprints. That is to keep charging subconscious paths while performing the activity from different perspectives. For example if I want to play basketball at a transcendental level the entire time that I'm playing, I will want to charge a subconscious path for this activity during its various different perspectives. For example if I charge a path for shooting 2 pointers, one for shooting 3 pointers, one for dunking, one for stealing the ball, one for blocking shots and so on, then eventually I will have a subconscious path available for pretty much every possible circumstance that I might encounter while playing the game.
In essence, this means that I'll be able to play the basketball game transcendentally the whole time that I'm playing. This is why a single subconscious path is largely insufficient in practice to help you perform transcendentally. In reality, you will generally need multiple subconscious paths for some activity to perform transcendentally in it. Each path would cover some different perspective of the activity from the view of the subconscious mind. But then how to do you actually accomplish this in practice? What would you do to ensure that you're charging a subconscious path from each of the different perspectives that some activity may have from the view of the subconscious mind? Well there's really no way to ensure this from the conscious mind's perspective since the activity always looks the same to it. However the best approach is simply to keep going in and out of a transcendental state while performing the activity in as many different circumstances as possible. This would even include performing that activity in different physical locations and with different people as these parameters would also determine how similar some activity looks to my subconscious.
As I keep doing this then, in theory, multiple subconscious paths will start charging up more and more. As another example, let's say that I want to always be very confident when I'm in a conversation with others. To achieve this I would hold the intention to be feel confidence until I enter a transcendental state and also while holding a conversation. When I do enter a transcendental state, I would then switch to continuing the conversation using my positive mind. From there I would keep repeating this process for many different topics of conversation, with many different people and in many different environments. As I keep charging subconscious paths in this manner from as many different possible conversational perspectives as possible, I will eventually charge so many paths that at least one of them will always be called and accessed when I'm in any conversation at all. I should also note that it needn't be the case that only one subconscious path be called at a time. It could also be the case that one main path is called when engaging in the activity from some particular perspective and that multiple minor paths are also called when engaging in the activity from that same perspective. This is actually shows that multiple paths can be called at the same time and combine in interesting and sometimes unpredictable ways when compelling you to perform in some manner. This creates a relatively emergent phenomenon in subconscious compulsion that we'll discuss a bit more later on in the chapter.
From these examples though, it is clear that one hurdle involved in charging the subconscious for the purpose of transcendental performance has to do with continuity. In other words, we'll need to make sure that our subconscious is charged in such a way that it's able to compel us to perform transcendentally the entire time that we're engaged in some particular activity. If we engage in the activity from some perspective that the subconscious does not recognize, then the subconscious will not access a subconscious path and our performance will just go back to normal. In fact this is what caused the drop off problem mentioned at the beginning of the chapter. To talk about this problem more easily, I find it useful to create a new subconscious parameter that I refer to as subconscious universality or simply universality for short. This refers to how many different circumstances your subconscious can recognize an activity from and therefore recall and access a charged subconscious path for. Thus the more universality a transcendental performance charge has, the more easily you'll be able to maintain a transcendental level of performance while engaged in that activity. This also means that your subconscious will be highly volatile in more and more different circumstances relative to some particular activity and will be less likely to experience the drop off problem.
We still need to talk about the "energy logistics" of managing multiple subconscious paths in order to maintain a high degree universality for some transcendental performance charge. However, an interesting case of subconscious path universality I wanted to mention here has to do with the singing experience that I talked about in chapter 3. I mentioned there that I charged my subconscious to sing at a transcendental level. I did this by holding the intention to feel more emotion, as I sung, until I entered a transcendental state. I also imagined some story in my mind while physically singing during this time as well. Now as I went in and out of a transcendental state and attempted to sing with more of my instinct while in a transcendental state, I actually started to charge paths that helped me to sing transcendentally at different parts of the song. This was especially true for the parts of the song that were very difficult to pull off using normal bodily control. Well as I kept charging in this manner, I eventually built so many paths in my subconscious memory that I could sing the whole song at a transcendental level without experiencing much drop off.
I should note that when I performed this particular charge, I eventually tried to sing other songs I was practicing at that time too and found that I could not actually sing these songs as transcendentally as I could the original song that I performed the charge for. I did feel though that I could sing these other songs a little bit better than my normal performance level. But I couldn’t sing any of them near the transcendental level of performance that I could with that original song. Thus my charge had a great deal of universality for that particular song but not that much for any other song. I suspect that great singers will have performed a similar kind of charge for so many different kinds of songs that they will have subconscious paths for just about any kind of song there is. In other words they’ll be able to perform transcendentally for almost any song they attempt to sing. To the untrained eye, it would simply look like this was their normal performance level and that this level for them is just that amazing. But in reality it would more than likely be a reflection of the high universality of their transcendental performance charge for singing.
Another example of subconscious paths that I thought was interesting enough to mention here occurred in the popular 2017 fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr and Conor Mcgregor. Floyd Mayweather Jr is natural pro boxer while Conor Mcgregor is natural MMA fighter. However both fought each other in a crossover boxing event. During the match, it was clear that Mcgregor kept instinctively trying to get behind Mayweather's back to get into some sort of advantageous position. However being behind someone's back wouldn't have any kind of advantage in boxing at all and is not something that I've ever seen done by pro boxers. However, because Mcgregor is a natural MMA fighter, he kept feeling instinctive urges to do this and had to keep stopping himself from giving into that urge. What was really occurring on a subconscious level was that the activity of boxing looked similar enough to the activity of an MMA fight that Mcgregor's subconscious ended up accessing subconscious paths associated with MMA during the boxing match. Thus whenever his opponent got into a certain position, the first category in one of these MMA paths was accessed and Mcgregory felt a natural compulsion to follow that compulsion toward the end of the path, which was trying to get behind the opponent. Needless to say, Mcgregor had to keep resisting these MMA compulsions the whole fight.
DEEP CHARGING TRANSCENDENTAL PERFORMANCE
One topic about subconscious paths we’ve not yet covered is the act of deep charging them. But then, can they even be deep charged? How exactly are we to interpret what it means to do so for subconscious paths? Well, for me, deep charging doesn’t quite have the same meaning for transcendental performance that it does for emotions. When deep charging emotion, our goal was to store as much positive memory, around a single frequency, in our short-term memory as possible and then use our enhanced mood to boost the strength of our main charging technique. This strength that our main charge achieves then works to make our short-term memory even more positive, memory wise, which ends up enhancing our mood even more. So there’s effectively a kind of feedback loop going on here that allows our subconscious charge to become more and more intense over time. Now when a subconscious path becomes more and more intensely charged, it will compel you more strongly and you will feel emotion more intensely as your mind traverses the path. You will also be able to express your other transcendental mental abilities more powerfully as well. However, your goal for transcendental performance isn’t necessarily just to make your subconscious charge more and more intense like it was emotion. You're also going to want it to have more and more universality too. This means that you’ll want to be able to perform at a transcendental level in more and more circumstances for some particular activity and not experience the drop off problem.
Now you could set out to obtain both universality and intensity regarding your transcendental performance charge, but then there’s a bit a problem that you will run in to in attempting to to do this. Charging your subconscious for the purpose of intensity requires you to make subconscious memory more and more positive in nature. And you could do with this with a particular subconscious path by going in and out of a transcendental state while your mind traverses that path over and over again. For example, in the case of a song, you could recharge your subconscious response to the song by going in and out of a transcendental state while listening to that song, telling some story in your mind as you do and then repeating this over and over again. This would effectively recharge the path that is associated with this song in your subconscious memory. However, most activities are not going to contain static unchanging paths like this that are easy to recognize by your subconscious. Yet, even for activities that require many paths to achieve universality in regarding your transcendental performance, the process for the charging the path is the same.
Namely your mind, in essence, would have to traverse the path over and over again in order to charge it. One issue with doing this for multiple subconscious paths though is that it's probably going to take a great deal of time to pull off. In fact, one aspect of subconscious paths that we have not really discussed yet has to do their memory states. Although it was already somewhat presumed to be the case, I would like to clearly establish here that subconscious paths also have active and passive states. Now when your attention is traversing one subconscious path for some particular activity, then that subconscious path is in an active memory state. And when that activity changes in some way from the perspective of the subconscious mind, another subconscious path will be called, assuming your performance charge has high universality. When this occurs, the original path will switch to a passive state and the new path will go active. Now the moment the original subconscious path switches to a passive state, it actually starts to lose charge – this process was discussed in chapter 10. But you don't want this path to lose too much charge because you may still it to strongly compel you at some point during the activity so that you're able to perform more transcendentally.
But then let's say that you go back to the original path then and charge it back up again so that it doesn't lose too much charge. Well now the other path that you just accessed prior has switched to a passive state and is now losing charge too. Thus this game of jumping around from path to path to prevent them from discharging too much is ultimately a never ending process. And that is ultimately the big issues I was referring to earlier. The more time you spend focusing on charging one subconscious path so that it becomes more and more intense and compels you more and more strongly, the more other paths related to transcendental performance charge are losing energy. By the same token, the more subconscious paths you try to create for some activity, so every unique perspective that activity could have is covered, the more time it's going to take to charge them all up. If you have too many paths, then it will simply become unrealistic to keep all of them charged up as they will have simply lost too much energy by the time your attention gets back around to charging one after having charged the rest. Thus having more and more paths will generally mean that they all have less and less charge and will compel you more and more weakly as a result. If they compel you too weakly, then you're really not performing transcendentally at all and will just be performing at a normal performance level.
This above analysis shows us a rather peculiar dichotomy between the intensity of a charge and the universality of it. It seems that these two characteristics of a charge actually have an uncertainty like relationship with each other. This means that charging your subconscious at all will always require both of these values to have a certain minimum amount of strength otherwise we could not describe it as "transcendental". However past that minimum point, the more intense your charge becomes, the less universality it is going to have and the more universality it has, the less emotional intensity you will feel. This principle is very important it because means that we cannot both feel emotion very intensely and perform very well at the same time. You will have to pick one when charging your subconscious mind. This is something I'm always cognizant of when I'm charging my subconscious for emotion or performance. I know that if I want to charge my subconscious to feel emotion more intensely, my performance level will begin to drop. In fact this actually started happening to me when I first started to practice controlling my subconscious by feeling emotion more intensely, however I wasn't aware that there was any direct relationship between these two occurrences at the time.
Going back to the topic of deep charging, we can now define it more formally for the case of transcendental performance. Deep charging transcendental performance essentially means having more and more paths charged up in your subconscious short term memory for some activity. The more paths that you can keep decently charged up at once, the more these paths will all compel you in their passive memory state. This means that your mood will actually feel more "actional" than emotional. This means you will constantly be in the mood to engage in some action related to the activity associated with your transcendental performance charge. For example if I deep charge the ability to tell jokes, I will constantly be in the mood to tell jokes. Now you will still feel some emotion rather strongly when deep charging transcendental performance, but not as strong as an actual emotional deep charge. Furthermore, you could also say that there is a range of intensity that the subconscious paths in your short term memory can have and still be able to help you perform transcendentally. Thus some paths in your short term memory may be more charged than others since they need to have a basic minimum to be considered charged. However if you concentrate your performance charge for some activity to a very specific circumstance within that activity, then you can get even more energy in your paths and perform even more transcendentally for that particular circumstance.
Of course you will have to give up some universality to pull this off. For example if I charge my subconscious to perform transcendentally in boxing, I can do this in a general way that applies to all boxers or I can do it in a way that primarily applies to south paws who are slow but have a lot of power. This more specific performance charge will still help me in other areas as well but not as much as when I'm specifically facing the type of opponent mentioned. This is why sports players like to compete against many different types of opponents in practice. If they get too used to one type of opponent, then they will end up charging subconscious paths only for that specific type of opponent and not any others. This causes them to be able to have a better and better performance capability against that one type of opponent but they tend to lose their performance capability against other types of opponents. Since the sports player is not focused on those other opponents or circumstances, the subconscious paths associated with them for the activity of boxing starts to lose energy. Once they've lost too much energy, we often describe this by saying the player is rusty. Thus, even for a highly active sports player, they must keep practicing with different opponents with different styles for their subconscious paths maintain a charge so they don't get rusty with respect to any one opponent's style.
Similarly, in education it is basically impossible to become highly specialized in many areas at once. For example a physics professor or researcher will often only have a specialty in one or two areas of science. You will not usually find a scientist described as a specialist in quantum mechanics, astronomy, biology, computer science, chemistry, engineering, medicine and so on at the same time. Each of these areas not only requires a great deal of time to learn but also requires a relatively intense performance charge to be able to perform well on the spot at their place of profession. When a scientist tries to specialize in too many areas at once, they lose the ability to perform transcendentally in any one of them. They will generally have to focus primarily on one or two particular areas of study in order to be able to perform transcendentally in them. Another aspect deep charging for transcendental performance is the additional time and dedication that it requires compared to a normal emotional deep charge. Emotional deep charges generally only use one main type of subconscious path that is fairly short in distance at that. This makes it fairly easy to deep charge emotion. Transcendental performance on the other hand makes use of many different subconscious paths that all require your attention to charge. This means that charging for performance will generally occur much slower than for emotion and will require you to constantly engage in some activity in different circumstances. And even after you've performed this deep charge, you now have to actually maintain it by continuing to engage in some activity from these different perspectives. Again this is why sports players never reach a certain level of skill and then just stop practicing altogether if they're no longer interested in gaining more skill. The moment you stop engaging in these activities from different perspectives, you will begin to lose your deep charge. So you've got to maintain your deep charge in one way or another indefinitely in order to maintain your transcendental level of performance.
One last aspect of deep charging I'd like to mention has to do with their fascinating connection to the neural network in our brain. Since subconscious paths in your short term memory can still compel you in their passive state, this must mean that a whole bunch of paths can all compel you to perform some action at the same time and regularly do when you deep charge for transcendental performance. I believe this combination of compulsions from multiple subconscious paths can even create relatively new and unpredictable emergent compulsions that would be difficult to charge directly. If we were to try to visualize all of these subconscious paths in your short term memory, you might imagine a network of linear structures that are all connected to each other like roads. In many ways this road like network of paths, though metaphysical in nature, actually resembles the way the neural network in our brain is often depicted in pictures – at least to me it does.
I've often wondered if the nerve network in our brain actually directly charges a corresponding subconscious path network in our subconscious. In this case, this path network would belong to your ground state and would be responsible for your normal performance level. If a person's brain becomes damaged in some way, then this path network is also damaged and a person's normal performance level drops. They could charge these paths using their intention instead but then the path would constantly lose energy and thus constantly require the attention of the individual to keep charged up. Of course this highly theoretical view of the connection between subconscious paths and the neural network in your brain doesn't offer anything new in terms of subconscious control, but I thought it was an interesting enough connection to mention here.
LONG-TERM SUBCONSCIOUS MEMORY
The next topic I’d like to cover about subconscious paths is what happens when they’re in a passive state for a prolonged period of time. As was the case was for regular subjects and categories, subconscious paths also end up losing energy more and more as they spend more time in a passive state. Eventually they’ll age out and transition into your long-term memory. At this point, the energy they do have is relatively negligible and is no longer strong enough to affect your mood. However, also like regular subjects and categories, they still retain the ability to compel you at decent levels of intensity when they finally do switch back to an active state while in your long term memory. This is generally true even when they’re finally recalled for the first time years later. I remember when I was younger, I used to play a game called “Super Street Fighter II Turbo” online a lot. I’d probably even say that, in my prime, I had come close to playing at a professional skill level. The pros used to play in real life tournaments and were really skilled at it. I wasn’t as good as most of them but I would at least say that I could hold my own against them and give them a decent challenge. I had even won a few rounds whenever I got the chance to play some of the top pros online. Well, I remember that I had stopped playing this game for many years and then one day decided to try to play it again. When I had, I was quite rusty as you might expect and forgot a lot of the moves and techniques that I used to use when I played everyday.
But what was interesting was that, when I did start playing, I began to instinctively start using a whole bunch of move sets that I had since forgotten about on a conscious level. For example Ken was my favorite character and I used to have a lot of techniques that I employed when I played with him. I even developed a special move that I would use to quickly get behind the opponent and perform a throw technique, which for Ken was actually a knee bash. It didn’t work too often on the more experienced players because they were quick and experienced enough to know how to counter it. But the newer players were often thrown off by it and didn’t know how to counter it all. Well when I was playing with Ken again after having not played the game for so many years, I found myself doing this move instinctively even though I had completely forgot about it. When my opponent was in a certain position, I pretty much “just knew” to use this technique and try to get behind my opponent so that I could grab them. Even my controller dexterity seemed to be coming back to me naturally. At first it was difficult to move my fingers in the necessary to way pull off certain moves quickly. But then all of sudden it just started coming back to me and I could feel this urge to move my fingers in a certain way that made it easy to pull off certain move sets.
This experience shows that the subconscious paths that helped me to play transcendentally years prior, still had a half decent amount of energy in them years later – even after being in a passive state for so long. Thus for any activity that you charge a whole bunch of subconscious paths for, those paths will be around to help you with your performance for many years. Of course they won't have enough charge to help you as much as they could when in your short term memory, but they'll still have enough help a little, at least in their active state. You could even think of them as, in a sense, giving you a new normal performance level compared to the normal performance level you had before charging subconscious paths for that activity. This is again why I stress that students go through moments of rigorous studying to understand math on a deeper level. Once you’ve developed a whole bunch of paths that help you in solving math problems, those paths will stick with you to some degree likely for the rest of your life. This same principle applies to any transcendental performance charge as well. In fact all of these years later, I have noticed that I can still sing that same song, the one I mentioned using transcendental control to sing in chapter 3, at a slightly higher level of performance than I could before I charged my subconscious to sing it and compared to most other songs that are still new to me.
TRANSCENDENTAL PERFORMANCE CHARGING IN THE MIND
One annoying aspect of charging subconscious paths that you may have noticed is what you might call their “logistical constraints”. Charging the subconscious to feel emotion more intensely was fairly easy to do by comparison. You can pretty much charge any time of day, wherever you are, do it in your mind for relatively short intervals of a few seconds to a few minutes at any time and even listen to music on your mobile device to help you charge as you do. Very few obstructions or inconveniences tend to get in the way when you’re charging for the purpose of emotion. Transcendental performance charging on the other hand is much more constrained than this. In this case, you have to actually be engaged in the activity you want to perform transcendentally in. For example if I want to play basketball with a lot of confidence, then a confidence charge that was performed while walking down the street won’t carry over that well to the activity of playing basketball – this is due to the principle of activity closeness. This kind of transcendental performance charge would work best if I charged confidence while actually playing basketball instead of charging it while performing some other activity. This is incredibly constraining though because I’m not always at a basketball court to be able to perform this kind of charge. And even if I did want to go to a basketball court on my own time, charging while practicing by myself won’t quite be the same as charging while playing against other opponents.
To my subconscious, the act of playing basketball by myself would look very different from the act of playing basketball with live opponents and thus any charge performed while playing by myself wouldn’t carry over as well to the circumstance where I’m playing against live opponents. These constraints are even more annoying when you consider the fact that the subconscious favors intermittent charging intervals and that performing a real world activity requires so much of your attention that it can be hard to still have enough of it left over to properly focus on the mental act of charging. You will likely just build negative memory for that activity as you continue to engage in it rather than positive memory. I should mention here that pre-charging does in fact still work for transcendental performance charging as well but this makes even less sense due to the logistical constraints of such a charge. You’d have to perform an activity for about 10 seconds or so and then stop for about 10 minutes before repeating the process. To help deal with these annoying constraints on transcendental performance, there is one trick that I learned to use. This involved simply performing a transcendental performance charge using your own imagination. The key to doing this was for me to perform some activity in my own mind but try to do so in a way that causes that activity to look very similar, from the perspective of my subconscious, to the act of performing that activity in the real world. If successful, then the charge in my mind would successfully carry over to a real world circumstance as well.
In theory, this technique could at least help out a little with the timing and environmental constraints involved in a normal transcendental performance charge. In fact trying to pull off this trick was actually how I came to theorize about the concept of subconscious paths. After learning how to charge for transcendental performance in real world activities, I became curious to know if I could avoid these annoying constraints by charging in the mind and then having that charge carry over to some real world activity. I strongly believed that this could be done but I had a lot of trouble pulling this off at first. No matter what I’d done, I kept experiencing the drop off problem in my efforts. However, once I started thinking about it in terms of subconscious paths, I finally found that I was able to correctly perform this kind of charge. To test my theory of subconscious paths in an experiment, I decided that I would pick a fairly random emotional feeling, charge it up and then maintain its intensity while going about my day interacting with others. This should cause me to begin interacting with others in a way that reflects the frequency of my charge and enable me to do so at a transcendental level of performance. This is actually not unlike what actors do when preparing to play a particular character role – we'll talk more about this shortly. I decided that I would focus on a feeling and character role that I’ve become rather fascinated by in my old age. In the last few years, I’ve found that I’ve become somewhat fascinated by medieval stories – particularly as they relate to knighthood. I’ve become somewhat enamored by the idea of a brave and courageous knight who lives honorably and fights to protect his kingdom.
Well I decided that I would focus, not necessarily on this honorable knight feeling but rather, on the feeling of being an honorable medieval king. I know that might sound kind of strange but I wanted pick a feeling that was fairly unfamiliar to me and that actually affected my behavior in a way that could easily be demonstrated in my interactions with others. After listening to some medieval king style instrumental at the time that I really liked, I decided that I would focus on this feeling for my experiment. If my theory of subconscious paths was correct, then all I would need to do to accomplish this transcendental performance charge in my mind is keep going in and out of a transcendental state while imagining myself performing various activities as a king. In order to build up the large amount of subconscious paths needed to obtain a good chunk of universality for this charge, I’d need to do this with as many different kinds of scenes in my mind as possible. I would charge scenes where I’m at war, where I’m celebrating victory of war, where I’m giving inspirational speeches to the knights, where I’m at the knight round table talking with to knights and where I’m taking judicial cases from the peasants and things like that. Over the course of a few days, I just kept charging different scenes like that in my mind with the hope that I’d eventually charge so many subconscious paths related to being a king that there would always be at a least one charged up to compel me to act like a king in my daily interactions. This presumes that my daily interactions would look similar enough to the activities I played out in my mind that my subconscious would call the subconscious paths related to those activities.
Well after doing this, sure enough, it pretty much worked like clockwork. I found that I did start to behave very much as I imagined a king would in my daily life. I started to walk around and interact with others with this intense feeling of strength and determination. I’d felt that my will in general was so much stronger than usual and that I could use it to, in a sense, win over others. It’s as if I kept wanting to lead others and wanted them to cede authority to me solely out of respect for how strong my will was and how regal my presence felt. If you’ve ever seen someone who carries themselves as a strong and honorable leader, then you may have felt more comfortable with them in control. This leadership position was actually the way I started seeing myself and felt attracted to trying to obtain when interacting with others. Being in charge just naturally felt more comfortable to me. I noticed that when I spoke, I naturally projected an intense amount of authority and command in my voice – a form of transcendental control. Even when I sat down, I’d often sit in this very king like posture that I’d always imagine kings sitting in with their right elbow on their right knee and their left palm on their left knee. This form of transcendental control even expanded into the way I walked and into my creativity when interacting others.
Performing this charge was actually a pretty amazing experience for me and I began to have a better understanding of why people seek out leadership roles when they usually don’t have to. But overall the fact that this charge had worked seemed to prove my theory about subconscious paths and had also demonstrated that you can charge your subconscious for transcendental performance in real world activities by charging while performing similar activities in your own mind using your imagination. However, the activities in your mind must look enough like the real world circumstance for the paths to be properly called during that time. Furthermore I’d still say that, while charging in your mind can help, there’s still really no substitute for charging while actually performing the activity in the real world. That is still the best condition to actually charge your subconscious in when it comes to transcendental performance.
An interesting application of this technique, that is actually somewhat more advanced in nature and is very well known, is the practice of method acting. For those of you who are unfamiliar with this term, it is actually a very common technique that actors use to help themselves to really get into a role that they’re playing. They do this by pretending to be the character they’re meant to play on stage, even when they’re not on stage. They actually stay in character all the time, when they’re out with friends, running errands or even when they’re by themselves. The idea is that this intense immersion into a character role will help their acting performance later on when they’re actually on stage. This technique has been known to have a very high success rate in enhancing an actor’s performance too and I believe the reason why it works can really be explained in terms of subconscious paths. When an actor stays in character, when they’re not actually on stage, what they’re really trying to do is build up a whole bunch of subconscious paths related to the character they'll be playing. They're likely also constantly holding the intention in their mind to behave as they believe the character they're playing would. They actually end up holding this intention until they enter a transcendental state and keep doing this throughout the day although they are probably not aware of the mechanics of the subconscious mind while doing so. In the end though, they end up charging subconscious paths related to their character role.
But they don’t just confine this practice to their mind as I did. They also hold this intention while interacting with others in the real world. They end up constantly going in and out of a transcendental state both when focusing on scenes in their mind and while interacting with others in the real world as they go about their day. Over time a whole bunch of subconscious paths develop for various activities and start compelling them to behave a certain way, even during their everyday interactions. Perhaps the most valuable part of these compulsions for an actor would be the transcendental control they gain as a result. It is transcendental control overall that allows actors to give truly convincing and amazing performances. In some cases, actors will even develop slight mannerisms or ticks as a result of these charged compulsions – this happened to Heath Ledger when he played Joker. And it won’t just be "any" mannerism or tick that they develop either. It will be one that matches the overall frequency and organizational pattern of the character – we’ll talk more about this shortly. This helps them to give an even more amazing performance.
When actors inflect their voice or project emotion through it, make certain facial expressions, take on certain postures while acting and so on, they’re able to do all of these things in a more emotionally stimulating way for the observer as a result of transcendental control. And when an actor doesn’t have any of these paths charged up and then tries to act on stage, it can often come off as very unconvincing and even overly forced if you’re not very experienced. This of course is because you’re now acting using normal control instead of transcendental control. If you’re an experienced actor, then the subconscious paths developed from your previous roles will actually remain with you for years and can still help your later performances. But the experienced actor's performance won’t be as transcendental in these cases. Only when you have charged up subconscious paths in your short term memory, can you really put on an amazing performance. At least that’s what should be the case based on this theory of subconscious and this fact does seem to bore out in reality as demonstrated by the technique of method acting.
THE COPY CHARGE
Another interesting phenomenon worth mentioning here has to do with the way entertainment media affects our transcendental performance. I remember when I was younger, I went through a phase where I was really into the Jamie Foxx tv show and made sure to watch these episodes on tv everyday. After doing this for a while, I noticed that I actually started to act like the main character in the show during my interactions with others. In a sense, I was imitating Jamie Foxx’s character on a subconscious level. I noticed a similar phenomenon occur when I started watching a whole bunch of medieval shows about knights. I found myself start to acting like the characters I’d watch in these tv shows as well. This phenomenon shows that the media we consume, particularly in the form of tv or movies, can actually cause us to inadvertently perform a transcendental performance charge.
I eventually came to call this kind of charge the “copy charge” because it resulted from copying movie and tv characters I’d spent a lot of time watching. This kind of charge occurs through the reflection principle and the fact that we’re actually charging a whole bunch of paths in our short-term memory that, in a sense, express the behavior of the character, or characters, that we’re constantly observing. As our subconscious short term memory becomes filled with these paths, they can affect our behavior – even while in their passive state. Furthermore if the activities in the real world remind our subconscious of the activities we were observing in the show, then they may get called and compel our behavior. But this will of course be on a scale of intensity. Thus when charging the subconscious for transcendental performance, even the movies and tv shows we watch can play an important role in this charge. Although it should be noted that this charge can also occur as a result being around certain people for prolonged periods of time as well.
HOW TRANSCENDENTAL CREATIVITY WORKS
Now that we’ve gone over the basics of how your subconscious charges for the purpose of transcendental performance, I’d like to now switch gears a bit and start talking more specifically about the nature of transcendental creativity. Although we’ve already gone over the more practical aspects of charging this ability, I’d like to still take a moment to talk about the more theoretical side of it as well. Unlike charges for other transcendental abilities, such as emotion, belief or transcendental control, transcendental creativity has a bit more theoretical depth to it. It isn’t completely necessary to understand this additional amount of theory to charge this ability overall, but still I think it can be useful to have anyway. The first thing I’d like to focus on is the question of just what creativity is exactly. Sure we pretty much use this term in everyday language all the time but what exactly are we referring to specifically when we do? Perhaps we could define creativity as the act of doing something in a clever or elaborate way. Another might describe it as the act of making or doing something in a way that it is able to capture the interest of others.
Looking at other external sources for this definition, I’ve actually seen it defined primarily as the act of coming up with a new and original idea. That definition doesn’t really make sense to me at all and is certainly not how I would define creativity. A super boring or uninterested idea can be both original and new at the same time and yet not be very creative in my opinion. From these different definitions though, it is rather clear that this term is actually somewhat difficult to define, at least in a more precise and objective way. Although we use this term in everyday language, I think what we’re really doing is using a more intuitive understanding of what creativity is and are not actually using it in some objective agreed upon manner. In fact I honestly don’t think you can truly define what creativity is outside of the theoretical framework of the subconscious mind as we’ve defined it and have discussed throughout this book. When using this particular framework however, defining creativity in an objective way does become possible but it can be a bit of an exercise in abstraction. We will go through the work of defining creativity in this manner now.
To understand exactly what creativity is, we’ll unfortunately need to go back to the concept of subconscious forms as was defined in chapter 7. Recall that these are special and unique ideals that our subconscious compels us to perceive and that represent the end point perception of a corresponding series of intentions that get closer and closer to an ideal expression. The corresponding endpoint, or ideal, intention whose command properly tells our subconscious to alter our perception to see a subconscious form is called a form intention. It was also established in chapter 7 that physical real world objects and relationships are able to imitate, or closely approximate, subconscious forms. Through the reflection principle and a process we called inspiration, we tend to produce intentions that help us to perceive subconscious forms whenever we observe good approximations of them in the real world. Now the term “creativity” essentially describes our subconscious’ innate ability to construct, or transform, a set of things into a particular pattern or configuration that matches or approximates a subconscious form. That is, in a nutshell, the most basic and objective definition of what creativity is. Again, a somewhat cold and sterile way of defining it, but I believe it to be the most apt description for what it really is.
However, we can still put things a bit more in layman's terms and say that, for any form of creativity or any activity that we’d like to be creative in, there will always be a set of things that we can arrange in a certain way. For example if we want to tell jokes, then the set of things to arrange will consists of the words we speak and the way we move our body for the delivery. When it comes to creating music, we’ll be looking to arrange a set of sounds into a particular pattern, including by time based components such as tempo and rhythm. When we want to create an interesting story by writing it down, we’ll want to arrange a set of words in a manner that conveys an ordered sequence of scenes and characters and so on. All forms of creativity will always involve this basic goal of arranging things into a specific pattern. Now out of all the possible arrangement patterns available in any particular activity you’d like to be creative in, there will only be fairly small number of arrangements – the ones that closely approximate subconscious forms – that will count as being “creative”. The rest will just be relatively cold patterns of arrangement that don’t provoke a particularly stimulating response out of your subconscious mind when you focus on them – in other words you will not become properly inspired by them. For example a random smattering of trash can sounds could hardly be considered music and the statement “the mud is brown” could hardly be considered a joke. Neither of these has the proper arrangement pattern, either in sound or in words, that matches forms associated with music or humor.
When you want to be creative at something, your job is to avoid arranging things into all of these meaningless patterns that have nothing to do with creativity and instead arrange them into the very few patterns that actually constitute what we mean whenever we use the term creativity. I want to reiterate that, while the list of arrangements that have nothing to do with creativity is incredibly large in most cases, the list of arrangements that do constitute creativity is fairly small by comparison – and thus easy to miss when you’re trying to create something. But then, if this list is so small, how do you ensure that you end up arranging things into the few patterns that actually constitute creativity and avoid the large amount of ones that don’t? Well the answer to this question lies in the power of your subconscious mind. This is essentially what it means to use your transcendental creativity. The subconscious actually has the innate ability to naturally compel you to arrange things in a manner that closely approximates a subconscious form or, put another way, the subconscious has the ability to find the few arrangements among a set of things that actually counts as creativity and can then compel you to arrange things into that particular pattern. For example if I want to create an epic instrumental, my subconscious will guide me into arranging sounds into a manner that closely approximates “epic music”. And when a person listens to this instrumental, they will have an easy time becoming emotional stimulated to feel what you might call epic emotions because the instrumental is a close approximation of this subconscious form.
It should be noted that the negative mind simply does not have this innate ability to find these special arrangement patterns and construct things according to them – at least not beyond your ground state charge. This is why your normal performance level for creativity is so limited. It’s as if the brain thinks that most types of creativity charges aren’t really worth the effort of maintaining and just sort of leaves them out of your ground state charge. Thus people who try to create by relying too much on the free will of the negative mind are essentially flying blind when they’re attempting to create – like sailor at sea without a compass. To properly create at a transcendental level, you must rely on your subconscious mind’s innate ability to construct things in way that matches the forms as well as its ability to compel you to do so. This compulsion of course will get stronger and stronger as transcendental creativity charges.
Lastly, for the sake of clarity, it should be noted that this function of transcendental creativity is not actually a form of altered perception, although that is what your subconscious will use as it compels you to create. Rather transcendental creativity represents your subconscious’ innate ability to find the few patterns that constitute creativity or that imitate a subconscious form. Your subconscious then uses its capability of altering your perception to guide you into arranging a set of things into that pattern. This is also what makes transcendental creativity the most unique of all of your transcendental abilities. Normally when you produce an intention, your subconscious just listens to this intention and executes some action meant to carry out the command expressed by your intention. But transcendental creativity doesn’t quite work in this same manner, at least not to the same degree as your other transcendental abilities. When you hold the intention to create, you have to do so in a relatively open ended kind of way because your negative mind doesn’t actually know what patterns constitute creativity. Since you don’t have this knowledge beforehand, you can’t really command your subconscious in a more direct way to be creative. At the same time, your subconscious will still respond to the intention to create and will quantize itself in a way that causes your subconscious instinct to try to start constructing things in the manner that we’ve defined as “creative”.
SUBCONSCIOUS ORGANIZATION
An important property of transcendental creativity has to do with a special phenomenon that occurs within your compulsions as this ability charges up. Now it is true that the intensity of subconscious compulsions grow stronger and stronger as your transcendental creativity charges, same as with any transcendental mental ability. However, there is also something else going on in the case of transcendental creativity that is very special and very important to understand. Specifically subconscious compulsions in this case start to become very complex and very well structured in nature as well. In a sense, they start to become packed with information in the form of procedural instructions that guide you in an almost algorithmic like way. In other words, it’s like your subconscious begins to write a complex program and starts compelling you to behave according to that program's instructions. And this program won’t instruct you to behave in a random, illogical or incoherent way either. Rather the program will compel you to behave in a highly organized and logical way. For example when you charge your subconscious to tell jokes, it will actually start to compel you to organize your words into a set up and punchline format and will then even instruct you on how you’re to move your body and inflect your voice as you tell the joke as well – this of course is the delivery aspect of the joke. All of this information will be incorporated into the compulsions you feel as you’re telling joke.
This special ability your subconscious has to incorporate highly complex procedural instructions into its compulsion is a phenomenon I call subconscious organization. I call it this because these procedural instructions are essentially guiding you in how to organize a particular set of things into a specific pattern. What that pattern is will be determined by the intention that you’re using to charge your subconscious. However, in general, that pattern will always be something that fits or closely approximates the subconscious form associated with the frequency of your subconscious charge. And this is again where transcendental creativity differs from your other transcendental mental abilities. The frequency of your transcendental creativity charge alone isn’t really enough to tell you what specific things your subconscious is compelling you to arrange in a certain way. For example if my subconscious is charged up at the humor frequency, then this alone tells me that my subconscious will compel me to arrange a particular set of things into a pattern that closely matches the humor frequency. But it doesn’t tell me if it’s going to be words that I’m arranging, when telling a joke for example, or if it’s sounds that I’ll be arranging, when making clown or carnival music for example. And it won’t be the case that I can naturally arrange both with equal affinity any time my subconscious charges up at the humor frequency at all. For example being good at telling jokes doesn't automatically mean that I'll also be good at making carnival music. When charging creativity, I’ll have to pick the one I want to be able to create at a transcendental level with. Putting that another way, I'll have to pick the one I want to be able to arrange according to the subconscious form humor.
The part of a transcendental creativity charge that contains information about what the specific set of things I’m arranging is will be the subconscious organization part. And as the subconscious charges transcendental creativity more and more, the subconscious tends to “organize” more and more as well. This just means that your compulsions will contain more and more complex instructions in them as they guide your behavior to construct something. In a sense, this is similar to how a program might become more and more dense with commands as it becomes more advanced in helping you to carry out some complex task. It should be noted that all creations that imitate a subconscious form will have a natural kind of structure to them that is very difficult to perceive on a conscious level, for the negative mind, but can be perceived quite easily by the subconscious, or your positive mind. For example I mentioned earlier that when your subconscious compels you to tell a joke, you will likely organize your words into a set up and punchline structure. Well similar kinds of structure also manifests in other things that your subconscious compels you to construct as well, but it is usually a lot harder to perceive that structure on a conscious level. For example when I listen to music from different eras, such as 80s, 90s and 00s Rnb music, I feel as though I can actually perceive a kind of intangible structure in the music that the songs from the 80s all have but that songs from 90s and 00s do not. Similarly RnB songs from the 90s and 00’s each also have unique structures within their music that are missing from other decades.
And yet all of them do still share the same base structure that makes them RnB songs and not dance songs or rock songs for example. I think this same phenomenon occurs for many different forms of art across different cultures. For example an American style action adventure movie might have a slightly different structure in its story and scenes than a Japanese style action adventure movie. Someone who is very familiar with both types of movies might easily be able to tell which is which based on the organizational structure they’re able to perceive within both movies. And yet someone who is not very familiar with either type would probably still be able to at least tell that both movies are action adventures, and not romances for example, based on the organizational patterns both movies would appear to share. These same principles apply to other forms of creativity such as literature, poetry, dance, visual art and so on. But these innate structural patterns aren’t just native to forms of entertainment either. I’ve read of cases where a martial artist compares the art of combat to music, insinuating in a sense that combat has a kind of innate structure to it that is not unlike the structure that music has to it. As I started to get use to thinking about different forms of art in terms of their organizational pattern, I started to feel that I could perceive these innate patterns every where. But again, as they’re quite intangible in nature, they’re very difficult to truly describe on a conscious level.
Another interesting area of subconscious organization worth looking at is one that occurs when our “creativity” takes on its other form, the one that we normally call “intelligence”. This is when your subconscious compels you to arrange a set of things into a pattern that we might say is associated with the form "logic". We generally like to arrange things into this form when we wish to solve a problem. For example it is possible to charge your subconscious to organize in a way that compels you to solve complex puzzles. In this case you could see a lot of pieces, of some set of things, out of order and your subconscious would cause you to feel urges that essentially guide you into putting these pieces back into their original order. A person with this kind of charge would be seen as having a certain kind of intelligence, even though it’s really just another form of transcendental creativity. Similarly you could charge your subconscious to organize in a way that allows you to be very good at finding the most efficient way of performing a laborious task in the real world. Similarly you could also get your subconscious to organize in a way that enables you to think using what you might call “mathematical logic”. When I went through my rigorous period of studying mathematics, I actually inadvertently charged an organizational pattern that matches the same organization pattern that math problems and their solutions are arranged according to. This made it easy for me to think in terms of math and solve complex problems using that same way of thinking. When I’d done this, I wasn’t entirely solving problems from a memorized sequence of steps. Rather I was actually thinking in terms of the innate structure that mathematics follows, almost as if I’d learned to speak the language of math. And when I came across a completely new kind of mathematical object or problem, such as a matrix or a topology, it would take a while again for me to see the deeper internal structure that the math follows. But once I could, I once again gained the ability to perceive that math on a deeper level and felt I’d learn how to speak its language.
CHARGING CREATIVITY
Now that we’ve gone over the additional theory that’s involved with transcendental creativity, let’s talk a little about the actual process of charging transcendental creativity. Of course the process is not really any different from transcendental performance charging in general. However, there are two main aspects of charging for transcendental creativity that I think are worth providing some additional clarification for. The first has to do with the intention that you hold as you’re entering a transcendental state. One of the trickiest parts of charging transcendental creativity is in simply commanding your subconscious to charge for this specific purpose. Now it is still true that all of your transcendental mental abilities do charge to some degree whenever your subconscious charges at all. However, transcendental creativity is a bit different because of subconscious organization. It won’t quite organize properly for some particular form of creativity unless you’re actually going out of your way to charge for that specific purpose. Although you can sometimes still get creativity naturally based on the activity that you’re engaged in while going in and out of a transcendental state. But this doesn’t always work. For example if I’m going in and out of a transcendental state while engaged in a conversation, I might naturally charge creativity in the form of coming up with stimulating conversation but I probably won’t charge it to be really good at telling jokes unless I specifically focus on charging for that purpose.
As mentioned earlier, because the negative mind doesn’t really know what creativity is on its own, it can be difficult to produce an intention that directly commands the subconscious to charge creativity. I believe the intention that seems to best accomplish this task is an intention that focuses on a set of things and expresses a command to “transform” that set of things into something else or perhaps focuses on that set of things and expresses the “make into” or “change into” command as it relates to that set of things. This is important because it can be very tempting not to produce this kind of intention and to instead use an intention that expresses the command to simply alter your perception so that something you're making appears more “creative” to you than it actually is. This means that you're charging your subconscious to perceive some particular subconscious form in the created thing more easily – which is like cheating if your goal was to actually create. The intention expressed in this case is usually something along the lines of "be more this". For example if want to tell a funny joke, I might hold the intention to "be more funny" while thinking of and telling this joke. I would actually say that this is one of the biggest mistakes people make when trying to be creative. It was also a big mistake that I would make all the time when I used to practice charging my subconscious to increase my creativity. Back then I would constantly try to tell jokes at a transcendental level. To charge this ability, I would often hold the intention to perceive my jokes as being more funny than they actually were rather than holding an intention that causes my subconscious instinct to actually start trying to create jokes.
This ultimately just means that I'm charging my subconscious to have an easier time perceiving the form humor in my own joke. Now doing this would technically be fine if I only wanted myself to laugh at my joke. But if I want my joke to make other people laugh, then they will not have this same perception altering charge that I have – at least I can't be sure that they will. The best way to actually create a good joke that makes them laugh is to simply organize the joke in a way that makes it a good approximation of the subconscious form humor. And the only way for me to pull this off is to properly command my subconscious to organize in the necessary way. But producing the proper intention to pull this off is very tricky. Once again, since the conscious mind can't really perceive forms, it can't really give a direct command to the subconscious to organize in the way it wishes. Producing a command that just alters your perception to perceive a form more easily doesn't actually get your subconscious to organize. Although the joke may look more funny to you with this approach it won't actually look funny to others since they likely won't have your same charge. To properly charge creativity, you've got to get your subconscious to actually organize and, in the my experience, the best intention to get your subconscious to do this, as mentioned earlier, is the "transform" or "make into" intention.
So when you're focused on some activity and want to be creative in it, you'd hold the intention transform something or change one thing into something else until you enter a transcendental state. For example when I'm in a conversation and what to charge my subconscious to tell jokes, I would hold the intention to transform or change the topic of conversation into something funny rather than holding the intention to see something I say as funny. As I do this over and over again, my subconscious instinct will successfully organize and will start trying to create jokes out of the conversation that I'm in. But achieving this state of organization in the subconscious is always a little tricky to pull off. I should also mention that the intentions that generally do get my subconscious to properly organize tend to make me feel like I have to really put in some work and effort to achieve it. This makes cheap form morphing intentions more tempting to use to charge my creativity. I know now that I must avoid these kinds of intentions for my charge. It is worth noting that when I do successfully charge transcendental creativity with telling jokes, my mind’s memory recall and resourcefulness tends to go through the roof. It kind of reminds me of that movie Limitless (2011) with Bradley Cooper. I feel like I’m able to come up with new ideas and recall highly remote and specific past memories on the spot and use them to enhance the conversation overall by adding to its context. However, to get to this point of super memory and super resourcefulness, I must try to “create” using my instinct while in a conversation or whatever activity I wish to be creative in.
The second tricky part of transcendental creativity I’d like to address involves the initial experience of charging it. Now most of your transcendental mental abilities tend to just become stronger and stronger in a kind of one dimensional way as your subconscious charges. However, transcendental creativity is different because it doesn’t just become stronger, it must also organize as your subconscious charges more and more. This means that at the very beginning of your charge, there won’t be an organizational pattern charged up and your subconscious instinct will tend to feel like it's going all over the place. At the very least, it won’t be trying to “create” something the way you want it to. For example when you first enter a transcendental state while performing some activity, your mind may drift into some random story in your mind and won’t be trying to focus on the activity itself or trying to create something out of it. This initial resistance from your subconscious can make it tempting to simply to avoid transcendental creativity altogether and rely instead on your normal creativity since that’s much more organized initially and is very easy to control. This is another mistake that I used to make and that I believe others end up making as well when they’re trying to be more creative. Although again they may not necessarily be aware that they’re doing this on a conscious level. If I want to charge creativity now, I recognize that I must get past that transient period at the beginning of the charge where organization is occurring slowly. At first when I enter a transcendental state, my mind won’t try to create and will be all over the place. However, as I keep going in and out of a transcendental state and keep trying to create in some way using my subconscious instinct – which again will have a very “just do it” kind of feeling to it – my subconscious will organize more and more. As it does, my subconscious instinct will become more and more focused on creating in a way that’s related the particular activity. When this occurs, it won’t feel like it requires as much work to create and will begin to feel relatively automatic.
As you can see, transcendental creativity is a bit trickier to charge than other transcendental mental abilities. However, if you can produce the proper intention to quantize your subconscious into creating and charge for a long enough a time that your subconscious actually organizes properly, then you’ll be able to start creating at a transcendental level of performance. As an example, if I wanted to charge my subconscious to say interesting things in a conversation, I would hold the intention to make the conversation more interesting while also holding the conversation – of course I must make sure to give enough of my attention to the conversation to actually continue holding it in a coherent manner. As I feel my mind entering a transcendental state, I would allow my mind to drift into it and then try to continue the conversation using my subconscious instinct. At this point I would then try even more to just say, or just think, of something interesting and do so using my subconscious instinct. And once my mind falls out of a transcendental state after a few seconds, I would then repeat this process over and over again. As I do, my subconscious will charge and become more and more resourceful in its ability to spontaneously think of interesting things to say in a conversation. The more I do this with different people, different topics of conversation and in different real world environments, the more universality my charge will have. And the more subconscious paths form in my short-term memory, the more all of these paths can combine with each other and create interesting and unpredictable emergent phenomena that enhance my creativity further.
An interesting phenomenon I’ve noticed with creativity charges has to do with what happens when the subconscious paths that carry this charge switch to a passive state. As you charge transcendental creativity more and more, the passive memory of this charge will become stronger and stronger as well. This means that you, in general, will be in more and more of a mood to create across the day. I’ve noticed that when I charge transcendental creativity in some way and am just going about my day not thinking about much of anything for a moment, my mind’s attention will suddenly wander back into a creative state and I’ll start trying to create again. In a sense, there is a kind of ethereal pressure from my mood that causes my mind to prefer a creative state and to try to get back into one whenever I relax my mind a little. What’s interesting about this phenomenon though is that I often find that my most creative thoughts come during these moments. Something about trying to create out of the blue, when your mind isn’t entirely even intending to, seems to enhance your creativity the most. I like to refer to this phenomenon as the pop in effect since it will feel like a highly creative idea just sort of pops into my mind. Creative thoughts during these moments tend to have incredible amounts of insight, organization and inspiration in them. In some cases, I have even charged creativity in my mind throughout the day and made sure to wait for these moments where the pop in effect occurs to get my best material. I would then write down the creative ideas I got during these moments and then save them for some performance at a later time. This effect can also be used to help a person gain deeper insight into something they’re studying and trying to get a better understanding of. It is possible that many scientist and great thinkers in history have experienced their greatest moments of insight and clarity during these special moments where the pop in effect occurs.
JUDGMENTAL THOUGHTS
Another piece of “troubleshooting” advice I’d like to give for transcendental creativity has to do with your affirmatively negative thoughts. These are simply judgmental thoughts that affirm that some creative idea that came into your mind is probably bad in some way. For example when I used to try to charge my subconscious to be good at telling jokes, I’d hold the intention to say something funny while in a conversation and then, when a thought would enter my mind, I’d think to myself “no I don’t want to say that” or “no, that isn’t funny enough”. It could also have been that the joke didn’t make sense to say out loud since my subconscious hadn’t properly organized yet. However, whatever the reason was, I’d consciously chosen to resist going with the flow of some subconscious compulsion to say a certain joke. This is fine in principle and you’ll always need to do this to some extent in practice. For example if a politically incorrect joke comes to my mind, then I’ll need to consciously resist it so that I don’t get myself into trouble. But it is possible to start resisting creative compulsions too much as well. I remember there would be times when I'd scrutinize my own creative ideas so much that I started to perform what you might call a “judgment” charge. This charge caused my subconscious to start to become more focused on judging whether or not my jokes were good or bad as opposed to actually creating good jokes.
I was still trying to subconsciously create during these times as well but this focus on judgment was also charging and seemed to be getting in the way of my creativity charge. This makes sense since even the act of judging whether or not your creative ideas are good or bad and whether or not you should resist the compulsion to express them eats away at your attention and charge. Thus in order to charge creativity properly, more of your attention – preferably much more – has to be given to actually creating rather than judging. And when you do this, your subconscious starts to focus more on simply creating and begins to organize properly. Creative ideas will then flow into your mind as well. At the same time though, if you don't give any of your attention toward the act of judging your creative ideas, then you really won't have any sense of how good or bad they are. Realistically you should still judge them a little bit, especially early on in a charge before much organization has occurred. You will also need to judge your ideas to assess how politically correct or ethical they are so that, once again, you don't get in to trouble. So there's really a balancing act between how much judging you do when charging transcendental creativity and how much you do not. But still, I'd say that the most pure and ideal state of creating is a completely judgment free state of mind. You see this idealism play out a little in your dreams where you’re no long judging what comes into your mind and reach extraordinary levels of creativity, although I am aware that this circumstance is a little different from creating during the day when you’re awake.
GOING DEEPER IN THE ZONE
The last major topic I’d like to discuss in this chapter has to do with a special state of mind that is colloquially referred to as “the zone”. We of course have already been using this term throughout the book even though we’ve not formally defined what it is. I’d like to do so now and talk about it in terms of transcendental state depth. Now the term “in the zone” generally refers to a special mental state where your performance in some activity is greatly enhanced and your thoughts feel like they’re in constant motion. This particular state occurs when your subconscious paths have become both highly charged and have a high degree of universality for some activity. As a result of this, your mind is able to constantly go in and out of a transcendental state while performing an activity and you feel strong compulsions continuously guiding your behavior during the activity. Now because your subconscious instinct is so focused on the activity, is so charged up and because it has become so volatile toward the activity itself during this time, your subconscious instinct can become so involved in the activity that it actually starts to feel like it’s taking over. Of course your negative mind still has free will and can resist the urges of the positive mind any time it wants to. However, if the negative mind chooses to acquiesce and essentially goes with the flow of these urges, then it will actually feel as though you’re performing an activity with your positive mind alone, which will feel like you’re performing that activity using pure instinct.
When this occurs, you’re said to be “in the zone”. Sometimes this is also referred to as a “flow state” as well. This is because of the constant flow of thought that seems to be rushing in from your positive mind. When people are in this state, they will usually be able to perform some activity at a very high level without feeling like they’re needing to give much conscious effort to do so. Interesting thoughts and creative ideas will just flow into their mind in a seemingly automatic way. This includes information about how to move your body as you’re performing the activity. Now what’s interesting about “the zone” is that, like transcendental mental states, it actually has varying degrees of depth to it. It is not simply the case that you’re either in the zone or you’re not. And if you are in the zone, then you’re always in it to the same degree each time. Rather it is possible to go even deeper into the zone. And what determines how deep you go into the zone, once again, has to do with how much attention you’re giving to an activity. When you’re able to perform an activity in a state of full attention, then you’ll be able to go even deeper into the zone than usual. Now, needless to say, this is actually going to be an incredibly difficult thing to do while performing a real world activity. It is difficult enough to reach a state of full attention while focused on telling a story in your mind, where you’re able to easily tune out the rest of the world. However, it is much harder to reach this state while performing a real world activity, where you’re not able to tune out the world around you.
For that matter, it is difficult enough to even enter a transcendental state while performing a real world activity, let alone a state of full attention. However, it is still possible to reach this state as you’re performing a real world activity. And when you do, your subconscious reacts much more strongly to the activity you’re engaged in and will compel you even more powerfully. Your actions will feel even more instinctual than a normal transcendental state. This was a state I was occasionally able to reach a few times when I was practicing to be a conversationalist. Based on my experience, I’d say that it’s nearly impossible to reach this state quickly and that it instead occurs rather gradually. As your subconscious charges up, your transcendental perception will always be affected in a way that makes it easier for you to draw your attention toward some particular subject or category and harder for you to move your attention away from it. Thus as your subconscious charges for transcendental performance relative to some activity, it will also become easier to direct your attention toward that activity. If you performed that charge by only going into a light transcendental state, then you’ll have an easier time afterwards going into a deeper transcendental state and performing a level two charge. It is still rather difficult to do though even then and I don’t think there’s really any way to truly master it. However, you can still enter this deeper transcendental state level and perform a level two transcendental performance charge using the techniques described in the previous chapter. For example if you can produce intentions that cause your subconscious instinct to become more and more interested in the activity, then you can actually reach a state of full attention when nearly 100% of your attention is focused on the activity.
It may also be possible to reach this state when you have an intense motivating desire related to the activity. You could technically reach a state of full attention by using the sleep awake method too but that would be kind of risky and wouldn't be recommended for an activity that can be dangerous for you should you lose focus. The sleep awake method also can’t be used too often in quick succession as well. While many performers have reported experiences that could be described as being very deep into the zone, where they seem to be acting on pure instinct, there is an interesting case where this occurs that I’d like to mention here. In Japanese and Chinese culture, this state of being very deep in the zone is actually a well known phenomenon that has obtained cultural significance when it comes to martial arts. Mushin in Japanese, or Wuxin in Chinese, is a Buddhist term that generally translates into “no mind”. It refers to a mental state in which one is devoid of attachments and is not preoccupied with everyday thoughts about the world around them. Rather their mind is now in a state of freedom where thoughts are able to flow quite naturally and harmoniously. Physiologically the brain is thought to enter a state of "transient hypofrontality" where activity in the prefrontal cortex is selectively reduced. Although originally a Buddhist term, it has largely been adopted by martial artists to refer to a state of mind in which a person is able to fight almost without conscious thought and instead both acts and reacts to their opponent using pure instinct. This mental state is considered to be very mysterious in nature and very difficult to reach in practice. However, when a fighter does reach this state, they’re able to perform martial arts at a much more impressive level that seems to go beyond what they’d normally be capable of otherwise. I believe that this special and mysterious state of mind is largely just the deeper "in the zone" state that we’ve discussed here.
FINAL WORD OF TRANSCENDENTAL PERFORMANCE
I know this chapter was a really long and quite theoretically intense, but I believe the new formalism we discussed in this chapter is ultimately the best way to think about transcendental performance charging. As mentioned earlier, I certainly did not wake up one day thinking about the nature of charging in this much more theoretically intense manner nor would I have preferred to do so. I only came to this more comprehensive way of thinking about the subconscious as a result of attempting to understand transcendental performance charging in general. That being said, the good news is that we will not be using this particular formalism very much for in book II – although I will make a few references to it. This is because concepts such as subconscious paths and charge universality are mostly only relevant when talking about charging for the purpose of performance. It’s not really necessary to use this more advanced formalism when talking about charging for the purpose of intensity, such as when charging emotion. And the rest of the transcendental abilities we discuss throughout book II will be focused more on intensity rather than on performance. That being said, transcendental performance charging is probably still the most useful kind of charge because it has the most functionality. Pretty much any time you want to perform well at something in life, you can use the concepts discussed in this chapter to help you. You will probably want to control your subconscious to help with your performance in some area more often than you will for any other reason, which would then be based on universality as opposed to intensity.
Footnotes
1. “World Memory Championships” is a competition where people compete to remember as many things as possible. In many cases, contestants are able to remember hundreds of different things such as people's names, objects or pictures after only seeing them once within a relatively short period of time. What’s interesting about this is that many of these contestants do not consider themselves to have been born with an extraordinary ability to remember things nor do they seem to retain this extraordinary capacity for recall for very long after they stop practicing. I believe what’s really going on here is that these contestants are using intention to charge their subconscious to remember things at a transcendental performance level. The more they charge this ability to remember, the more extraordinary their recall capability becomes.
2. An interesting characteristic about the subconscious form "logic" is that it actually has nothing to do with "truth" as we know it. It is often presumed that something can only appear logical or rational to us if it is also objectively truthful. But that assertion itself is not true. Logic is just an abstract subconscious form and can be perceived, through the reflection principle, whenever information is presented to us in a certain context or arrangement pattern. Thus information can be objectively wrong and yet still appear logical and rational to us depending on how that information is presented and how our intention form morphs it. In fact, presenting information in a way that approximates the subconscious form logic is a creative skill that lawyers seek to master. In reality logic has nothing to do with truth and the presumption that is does often leads to subconscious dissonance. In this case, the conscious mind's attempt to find truth just causes the subconscious mind to alter the individual's perception to see truth in whatever their intention is asserting to be logical. In reality, "truth" actually comes from God and also, through him, a higher level of awareness that we'll discuss in chapters 9 and 10 of book II.
3. In some cases when I would practice being a conversationalist, I would actually mentally rehearse and plan out my best jokes for later use. Eventually I learned how to essentially energize the act itself and make it subconsciously volatile so that when I would act out the routine in real time, it was subconscious charged up and I could deliver it in a transcendental way. This is actually the same technique that I believe comedians use. By charging the routine itself, this ensures their delivery is not flat, from too much negative memory, when they perform it on stage.
4. If your goal is to charge transcendental creativity, then you’re going to want to try to make your subconscious more and more interested in the act of creating. Or if you’re looking to charge intelligence, then you’ll want to make your subconscious more and more interested in trying to solve a problem.
2
3
4